IPSWICH
CITY
COUNCIL
AGENDA
of the
Council Ordinary Meeting
Held in the Council Chambers
2nd floor – Council Administration Building
45 Roderick Street
IPSWICH QLD 4305
On Thursday, 25 February 2021
At 9.00
am
Council Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
2. WELCOME TO COUNTRY OR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY:
3. OPENING PRAYER:
4. APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE:
5. CONDOLENCES:
6. TRIBUTES:
8. PRESENTATIONS AND DEPUTATIONS:
9. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
10. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST IN MATTERS ON THE AGENDA:
11. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES:
11.1. Ipswich City Council - Minutes of Meeting of 28 January 2021..................................................... 5
13. BUSINESS OUTSTANDING – INCLUDING CONDUCT MATTERS AND MATTERS LYING ON THE TABLE TO BE DEALT WITH:
13.1 Unreasonable Customer Conduct Policy........ 25
14. RECEPTION AND CONSIDERATION OF COMMITTEE REPORTS:
14.1. Growth Infrastructure and Waste Committee's Report.............................................................. 47
14.2. Governance and Transparency Committee's Report.............................................................. 57
14.3. Community, Culture, Arts and Sport Committee's Report........................................ 69
14.4. Economic and Industry Development Committee's Report........................................ 77
14.5. Environment and Sustainability Committee's Report.............................................................. 81
14.6. Ipswich Central Redevelopment Committee's Report.............................................................. 85
15.1 Resolution to close public land - 2020-2021 Fire Season fuel reduction program....................... 89
15.2 Public Monuments and Memorials - Assessment of Applications........................... 125
15.3 Ti Tree Bioenergy Payments - Project Development Process and Governance Framework..................................................... 191
15.4 Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program (Round 2) Funding Allocation......... 217
15.5 Naming of Your Places and Spaces - Community Engagement Report....................................... 221
15.6 Quarter 2 - Operational Plan 2020-2021 Quarterly Performance Report...................... 251
15.7 Tender No. 15218 - Trevor Street, Bellbird Park - Road Rehabilitation.................................... 315
15.8 Tender No. 16063 - Civil and Bridge Construction Works - Springfield Parkway and Springfield Greenbank Arterial, Springfield.. 323
15.9 Monthly Financial Performance Report - January 2021................................................. 331
16.1 Notice of Motion - Property Valuations....... 343
--ooOOoo--
Council Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
Unconfirmed Minutes of Council Ordinary Meeting
28 January 2021
Held in the Council Chambers, Administration Building
45 Roderick Street, Ipswich
The meeting commenced at 9.00 am
ATTENDANCE AT COMMENCEMENT |
Mayor Teresa Harding (Chairperson); Councillors Jacob Madsen, Sheila Ireland, Paul Tully, Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle, Andrew Fechner, Kate Kunzelmann, Russell Milligan and Nicole Jonic |
WELCOME TO COUNTRY OR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY |
Councillor Kate Kunzelmann |
OPENING PRAYER |
Councillor Sheila Ireland |
APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE |
Nil |
5. CONDOLENCES |
Nil
|
6. TRIBUTES |
Nil |
7. PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS |
Nil
|
8. PRESENTATIONS AND DEPUTATIONS |
Nil
|
9. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION |
Nil
|
10. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST COUNCILLOR ANDREW FECHNER |
In accordance with section 150EQ of the Local Government Act 2009, Councillor Andrew Fechner informed the meeting that he has a Declarable Conflict of Interest in the following items:
15.1 – Review of Footpath Dining 15.8 – Nicholas Street Precinct Stage 3 – Repeal of Previous Decision 15.9
– Nicholas Street Precinct Executive Report No. 23
to 15.10 – Retail Sub-Project Steering Committee Report No. 6 – December 2020 15.11 – Nicholas Street Precinct Cinema Complex Operator 15.13 – Nicholas Street Precinct Community Safety and Activation Engagement Report
The nature of the interest is that Councillor Fechner stands to gain a benefit or suffer a loss due to his business interest in Bar Heisenberg Pty Ltd and A1A Events Pty Ltd both of which are located in the top of town at 164 Brisbane Street, Ipswich.
Councillor Andrew Fechner advised that he will leave the
meeting room (including any area set aside for the public) while this matter
is being discussed and voted on. |
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST COUNCILLOR JACOB MADSEN |
In accordance with section 150EQ of the Local Government Act 2009, Councillor Jacob Madsen informed the meeting that he has a Declarable Conflict of Interest in the following items:
15.8 – Nicholas Street Precinct Stage 3 – Repeal of Previous Decision 15.9
– Nicholas Street Precinct Executive Report No. 23
to 15.10 – Retail Sub-Project Steering Committee Report No. 6 – December 2020 15.11 – Nicholas Street Precinct Cinema Complex Operator 15.13 – Nicholas Street Precinct Community Safety and Activation Engagement Report
The nature of the interest is that he is a member of the Ipswich Trades Hall and Labour Day Committee Executive which manages the Ipswich Trades Hall which is adjacent to the Nicholas Street Project that Council is undergoing.
Councillor Jacob Madsen advised that he will leave the meeting room (including any area set aside for the public) while this matter is being discussed and voted on. |
11. Confirmation of Minutes
11.1 Confirmation of Minutes of Ordinary Meeting |
Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Nicole Jonic: That the Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting held on 10 December 2020 be confirmed. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
12. mayoral Minute
|
Nil |
13. Business Outstanding – including conduct matters and Matters Lying on the Table to be Dealt With
|
Nil |
14. Reception and Consideration of Committee Reports
|
Nil |
At 9.06 am Councillor Andrew Fechner left the meeting room due to a previously declared interest in Item 15.1.
15. Officers’ Reports
15.1 Review of Footpath Dining |
Moved by Councillor Nicole Jonic: Seconded by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: A. That Council approve the following: 1. That existing Footpath Dining Licence operators be refunded any fees paid for a licence in the 2020-2021 year. 2. That new applications for Footpath Dining across all of Ipswich shall not be charged a fee for the 2020-2021 year. B. That Council note the proposed changes to its website as outlined in the report which encourages the extension of footpath dining arrangements. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic All Councillors except Councillor Andrew Fechner were present when the vote was taken. The motion was put and carried. |
At 9.07 am Councillor Andrew Fechner returned to the meeting room.
15.2 85 Thornton Street, Raceview - Road Widening
RECOMMENDATION a |
Moved by Councillor Sheila Ireland: Seconded by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: A. That Council maintain its policy as stated in Section 1.1.4(2) of Council’s Planning Scheme Policy 3 in relation to the proposed frontage roadworks for the development at 85 Thornton Street, Raceview. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
15.2 85 Thornton Street, Raceview - Road Widening RECOMMENDATION b |
Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: B. That Thornton Street not be converted to a Trunk Road.
|
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
15.2 85 Thornton Street, Raceview - Road Widening RECOMMENDATION C |
Moved by Councillor Russell Milligan: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: C. That the Developer of 85 Thornton Street, Raceview be advised of the above recommendations accordingly. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
15.3 Development Application Recommendation - 1 Union Place Mall, 23 and 27 Ipswich City Mall and 163 Brisbane Street, Ipswich - 11941/2020/OD - Operational Works (Advertising Services) |
Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Sheila Ireland: That Council approve Development
Application
|
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
15.4 Major Amendment of the Water Netserv Plan 2020 |
Moved by Councillor Andrew Fechner: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: That Council endorse the planning assumptions for the Ipswich local government area proposed by Urban Utilities in Water Netserv Plan 2020 (Part A) as being consistent with the planning assumptions included in the Ipswich Local Government Infrastructure Plan. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
15.5 Tender No. 15405 - North Station Road, Crib Wall |
Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Andrew Fechner: A. That Tender No. 15405 for North Station Road Crib Wall project be awarded to Shamrock Civil Engineering Pty Ltd (ABN 68 066 655 856). B. That Council enter into a contract with Shamrock Civil Engineering Pty Ltd for the provision of North Station Road Crib Wall project under a lump sum agreement for the sum of one million, eight hundred and seventy eight thousand, five hundred and thirty seven dollars and seventy one cents ($1,878,537.71 “total Contract Amount) excluding GST. C. That under s257 (1) of the Local Government Act 2009, Council delegate the power to the Chief Executive Officer to be authorised to negotiate and finalise the terms of the contract with Shamrock Civil Engineering Pty Ltd, to be executed by Council, including authorisation for the CEO, to approve any additional costs, up to 20% increase of the total contract amount and to do any other acts necessary to implement Council’s decision. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried.
|
15.6 Tender No. 15536 - Brisbane Road, Redbank - Road Rehabilitation |
Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Nicole Jonic: A. That Tender No. 15536 for the road rehabilitation project located at Brisbane Road, Redbank be awarded to BMD Constructions Pty Limited (ABN 59 010 126 100). B. That Council enter into a contract with BMD Constructions Pty Limited for 15536 Brisbane Road, Redbank – Road Rehabilitation, for the sum of one million, eight hundred and ninety-three thousand, nine hundred and sixty-eight dollars and thirty cents ($1,893,968.30 “total Contract amount”) excluding GST. C. That under s257(1) of the Local Government Act 2009 Council delegate the power to the Chief Executive Officer to be authorised to negotiate and finalise the terms of the contract with BMD Constructions Pty Limited, to be executed by Council including authorisation for the CEO, to approve any additional costs, up to a 20% increase of the total contract amount and to do any other acts necessary to implement Council’s decision. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
15.7 Key Deposit Fees for Council Facilities |
Moved by Councillor Andrew Fechner: Seconded by Councillor Russell Milligan: That Council resolve to adopt the new fee structure for key deposits and key replacement fees in relation to the use of Council facilities as set out in Attachment 1, to be introduced in association with the implementation of Council’s new key access system. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
At 9.34 am Councillors Andrew Fechner and Jacob Madsen left the meeting room due to previously declared interests in the following items 15.8, 15.9, 15.10 and 15.11.
15.8 Nicholas Street Precinct Stage 3 - Repeal of Previous Council Decision |
Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: A. That
Council repeal the previous decision of Council (of the Ipswich Central
Redevelopment Committee), contained at Item No. 14.6 in the report dated 30
July 2020 and adopted at Council’s Ordinary meeting of B. That
Council repeal the previous decision of Council contained at Item 15 in the
report dated 4 December 2020 and adopted at Council’s Ordinary meeting
of C. That Council proceed with Option 1 and 2(a) of the retail development works with J Hutchinson Pty Ltd for the Design and construct Contract for Ipswich Central Civic Project (Contract No 13254) and, subject to the execution of Agreement for Leases for 50% of the Metro B tenancies, proceed with Option 2 (b) of the retail development works. D. That under s257(1) of the Local Government Act 2009 Council delegate the power to the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) to be authorised to negotiate and administer and finalise the following variations of the retail development works with J. Hutchinson Pty. Ltd for the Design and Construct Contract for Ipswich Central Civic Project (Contract No. 13254) and to do any other acts necessary to implement Council’s decision: a. a contract variation of $15,800,000 for Option 1 and Option 2(a); and b. a contract variation of $2,900,000 for Option 2(b), the delegation of power and authorisation for the CEO to administer the contract variation being conditional upon the execution of Agreement for Leases for 50% of the Metro B tenancies. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Ireland Tully Doyle Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic All Councillors except Councillor Jacob Madsen and Councillor Andrew Fechner were present when the vote was taken. The motion was put and carried. |
15.9 Nicholas Street Precinct Executive Report No. 23 to 4 January 2021 |
Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Russell Milligan: That the Nicholas Street
Precinct Executive Report |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Ireland Tully Doyle Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic All Councillors except Councillor Jacob Madsen and Councillor Andrew Fechner were present when the vote was taken. The motion was put and carried. |
Matters Taken On Notice - Nicholas Street Precinct |
Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle requested clarification on the following matters: - lighting of the Administration Building in the Nicholas Street Precinct, confirmation as to the reasons why the lighting on each floor has been remaining on overnight while the building is still under development. - delivery of public art within the Nicholas Street precinct, confirmation of the proposed program and approach. The Project Manager Coordination and Performance to provide a response to these matters in the next monthly report to the Ipswich Central Redevelopment Committee. |
|
Attachments 1. Nicholas Street Precinct Executive Report submitted to February meeting 2. Retail Sub-Project Steering Committee Report submitted to February meeting |
15.10 Retail Sub-Project Steering Committee Report No. 6 - December 2020 |
Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: That the Retail Sub-project Steering Committee Report No. 6 for December 2020 be received and the contents noted. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Ireland Tully Doyle Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic All Councillors except Councillor Jacob Madsen and Councillor Andrew Fechner were present when the vote was taken. The motion was put and carried. |
15.11 Nicholas Street Precinct Cinema Complex Operator |
Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: A. That Council resolve that it is satisfied that the calling of Expressions of Interest under section 228(5) of the Local Government Regulation 2012, as detailed in this report dated 13 January 2021, is in the public interest for the following reasons: 1. It will allow Council to identify potential contractors who are serious contenders for the provision of Management and Operations of the Cinema Complex without putting all contenders to the expense of preparing a full tender response in the initial stages. 2. It will allow Council to identify the risk appetite of potential contractors and prepare the Request for Tender and the proposed Agreement for the provision of Management and Operations of the Cinema Complex based on this information. B. That Council resolve to invite Expressions of Interest under section 228(5) of the Local Government Regulation 2012, as detailed in this report dated 13 January 2021, for the provision of Management and Operations of the Cinema Complex in the Nicholas Street Precinct. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Ireland Tully Doyle Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic All Councillors except Councillor Jacob Madsen and Councillor Andrew Fechner were present when the vote was taken. The motion was put and carried. |
At 9.45 am Councillors Andrew Fechner and Jacob Madsen
returned to the meeting room.
15.12 Nicholas Street Precinct Communications, Engagement and Activation Monthly Report |
Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Russell Milligan: That the Nicholas Street Precinct: Communications, Engagement and Activation Monthly Report be received and the contents noted. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried.
|
At 9.47 am Councillors Andrew Fechner and Jacob Madsen left
the meeting room due to a previously declared interest in Item 15.13.
15.13 Nicholas Street Precinct Community Safety & Activation Engagement Report |
Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Russell Milligan: A. That Council endorse the attached Community Engagement Report and support its reference and use in the finalisation of the Nicholas Street Community Safety Strategy Action Plan as well as the 2021 Nicholas Street Precinct Activation and Events Calendar. B. That Council close the loop with survey participants to share the findings and let them know how their responses will help to shape the Nicholas Street Precinct moving forward. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Ireland Tully Doyle Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic All Councillors except Councillor Jacob Madsen and Councillor Andrew Fechner were present when the vote was taken. The motion was put and carried. |
At 9.49 am Councillors Andrew Fechner and Jacob Madsen returned to the meeting room.
15.14 Monthly Financial Performance Report - November 2020 and December 2020 |
Moved by Councillor Andrew Fechner: Seconded by Councillor Nicole Jonic: That the reports on Council’s financial performance for the periods ending 30 November 2020 and 31 December 2020, submitted in accordance with section 204 of the Local Government Regulation 2012 be considered and noted by Council. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
Matters Taken on Notice – Rates Revenue and CAPEX Program |
Mayor Teresa Harding queried the reduction in rates revenue of nearly $1million in relation to former mining properties that were reclassified by the Valuer General as primary producers and what activities these include. A. The Chief Financial Officer to confirm what specific primary production activities the properties are used for and provide the detail to all councillors. Mayor Teresa Harding queried the actions council is taking in relation to implementation of the CAPEX Program. B. The Chief Executive Officer to provide advice on what projects are being delayed this financial year.
|
|
A. Advice provided via email to councillors on 16 February 2021 B. Advice provided via email to councillors on 15 February 2021 |
Adjourn Meeting |
Moved by Mayor Teresa Harding: That the meeting be adjourned at 10.05 am to reconvene at 10.35 am. The meeting reconvened at 10.35 am. |
16. Notices of Motion
16.1 Notice of Motion - Amendment of Previous Resolution |
Moved by Councillor Paul Tully: Seconded by Councillor Sheila Ireland: Councillor Paul Tully gave notice of his intention to move the following motion at Council’s Ordinary Meeting of 28 January 2021:
MOTION
That the resolution of Council on 26 November 2020 adopting Item 6 of the Governance and Transparency Committee Report, be amended by deleting the words “either their express or implied consent” and inserting “their express consent”. ITEM 6 OF GOVERNANCE AND TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE ADOPTED AT COUNCIL 26 NOVEMBER 2020 A. That Council resolve that Councillor expenses for current serving Councillors are published only for those who have provided either their express or implied consent to their personal information being published on the Transparency and Integrity Hub. B. That Council note that the application for a waiver from its obligation to comply with the privacy principles in the public interest in line with section 157 of the Information Privacy Act 2009 in order for certain prescribed personal information of Councillors and Directors of controlled beneficial entities to be published on the Transparency and Integrity Hub is proceeding. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Ireland Harding Tully Madsen Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic The motion was put and lost.
|
SUPPLEMENTARY MOTION |
Moved by Councillor Sheila Ireland: Seconded by Councillor Paul Tully: That a legal opinion be provided from Council’s internal legal team on the meaning of “implied consent” in respect of the above motion. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Madsen Harding Ireland Doyle Tully Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
Matter Taken on Notice - Recommital of Repeal Motion |
Mayor Teresa Harding requested that the Chief Executive Officer provide advice to councillors on the process in other South East Queensland Councils in relation to repeal motions and how many times they can be recommitted to council. |
|
CEO provided advice via email to councillors on 2 February 2021. |
16.2 Notice of Motion - Council's Support for the expansion of the TAFE Qld Springfield Campus |
Moved by Councillor Nicole Jonic: Seconded by Councillor Paul Tully: Councillor Nicole Jonic gave notice of her intention to move the following motion at Council’s Ordinary Meeting of 28 January 2021:
MOTION
That the Office of the Mayor and CEO write on behalf of Ipswich City Council to the Queensland Minister for Training and Skills, Hon Di Farmer, along with the State Member for Jordan, Charis Mullen MP, expressing Council's support for:
· the expansion of the TAFE QLD Springfield Campus leveraging Federal and State funding for investment to deliver additional training infrastructure; and
· ensuring that the community of Ipswich benefit from the new Commonwealth Government Job Trainer scheme. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
16.3 Notice of Motion - Ipswich City Council Commitment - Ipswich Central to Springfield Central Rail Corridor - Options Analysis |
Moved by Councillor Jacob Madsen: Seconded by Councillor Sheila Ireland: Councillor Jacob Madsen gave notice of his intention to
move the following motion at Council’s Ordinary Meeting of
MOTION
That Ipswich City Council commit $500,000 to the Ipswich to Springfield Rail Options Analysis, subject to the Federal Government matching the $1,000,000 commitment already made by the State Government.
Further information to support the Notice of Motion:
At the 2020 State Election the State Government committed $1,000,000 in funding for the Ipswich Central to Springfield Central Rail Corridor options analysis, subject to Ipswich City Council committing $500,000, and the Federal Government committing $1,000,000.
In terms of the infrastructure needs of our rapidly growing city, it is necessary to ensure that the options analysis is completed as soon as possible. By Council committing our share, it falls to the Federal Government to make their own commitment to expedite this process, with the possibility of inclusion in their May 2021 Budget. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
16.4 Notice of Motion - Ipswich Current Elected Representative Working Group |
Moved by Councillor Jacob Madsen: Seconded by Councillor Andrew Fechner: Councillor Jacob Madsen gave notice of his intention to
move the following motion at Council’s Ordinary Meeting of
MOTION
A. That Council invite current local elected representatives in the Ipswich LGA (local government area) to form a new working group with said working group to meet quarterly and consist of local, state and federal elected representatives.
B. That a subsequent workshop be held in February with Councillors to develop a terms of reference for the operation of this working group.
Further information to support the Notice of Motion:
2020 was a disruptive year in many ways, and as a means to improve discourse between the three levels of government in Ipswich it is necessary to facilitate greater working relationships to ensure collaborative problem solving and effective advocacy for Ipswich.
All three levels of government have one special thing in common -- we work for the same people. In that spirit we should resolve to work together and maximize any and all opportunities be that through making better use of grant programs or advocating for the infrastructure that our growing city needs. |
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
16.5 Notice of Motion - Ti-Tree Bio Energy Contributions on the Transparency and Integrity Hub |
Moved by Councillor Jacob Madsen: Seconded by Councillor Sheila Ireland: Councillor Jacob Madsen gave notice of his intention to move the following motion at Council’s Ordinary Meeting of 28 January 2021:
MOTION
A. That a story be created on the transparency and integrity hub to show details regarding the contributions made to this Council by Ti-Tree Bio energy and how the funds are dispersed by Council.
B. That the story include the following: · particular focus on new methodology developed by Council to assess new projects delivered by the contributions. · the selection process used to assess priority with a view to incorporating the new processes used by Council to be rolled out by Council in coming months.
|
|
|
VARIATION TO MOTION |
Councillor Madsen moved a variation to Recommendation B of the motion:
B. That the story be prepared following the new guidelines that will be finalised in coming months, with focus on: · The new methodology for prioritising submitted projects · Any other relevant parts of the project selection process · How projects can be put forward by the public onto the list.
|
|
|
|
Moved by Councillor Jacob Madsen: Seconded by Councillor Sheila Ireland: A. That a story be created on the transparency and integrity hub to show details regarding the contributions made to this Council by Ti-Tree Bio energy and how the funds are dispersed by Council.
B. That the story be prepared following the new guidelines that will be finalised in coming months, with focus on: · The new methodology for prioritising submitted projects · Any other relevant parts of the project selection process · How projects can be put forward by the public onto the list. |
|
|
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Madsen Ireland Tully Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
|
|
17. Questions on Notice |
Nil |
||
MEETING CLOSED |
The meeting closed at 11.14 am |
“These minutes are subject to confirmation at the next scheduled Council Ordinary Meeting”
Council Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
ITEM: 13.1
SUBJECT: Unreasonable Customer Conduct Policy
AUTHOR: Integrity and Complaints Manager
DATE: 15 February 2021
Ipswich City Council (Council) is committed to quality service delivery to the community, meeting its legislative obligations to provide a safe and healthy workplace for its staff and to use available resources equitably and efficiently.
Council has a Complaints Management Framework and the purpose of this report is to recommend the adoption of an Unreasonable Customer Conduct Policy that will be a valuable part of that framework.
The Executive Leadership Team was consulted and endorsed the formal adoption of the proposed policy and the repeal of the two (2) Library Services Policies. The Mayor and Councillors have also been briefed on the proposed policy and recommendations contained in this report.
This report provides recommendations for the adoption of a new Unreasonable Customer Conduct (UCC) policy and the repeal of two existing Library Services policies in relation to UCC behaviours.
A. That the policy "Ipswich Libraries – Acceptable Behaviour Policy" as detailed in Attachment 2, as per Recommendation B of Item No. 3 of the Policy and Administration Advisory Committee No. 2018(01) of 13 February 2018, adopted at the Council Ordinary Meeting on 27 February 2018, be repealed.
B. That the policy "Ipswich Libraries – Customer Exclusion Policy" as detailed in Attachment 3, as per Recommendation C of Item No. 3 of the Policy and Administration Advisory Committee No. 2018(01) of 13 February 2018, adopted at the Council Ordinary Meeting on 27 February 2018, be repealed.
C. That the policy "Unreasonable Customer Conduct" as detailed in Attachment 1, of the report by the Integrity and Complaints Manager dated 15 February 2021, be adopted.
There are no declared conflicts of interest in relation to this report.
The only related party is Ipswich City Council.
Listening, leading and financial management
Ipswich City Council (Council) is committed to quality service delivery to the community, meeting its legislative obligations to provide a safe and healthy workplace for its workforce and to use available resources equitably and efficiently.
Council is also absolutely committed to ensuring that its staff treat people we serve in our community with courtesy and respect and that this courtesy is reciprocated. Council must not tolerate unreasonable conduct by anyone that is offensive, abusive or threatening.
Council has a Complaints Management Framework and the purpose of this report is to recommend the adoption of an Unreasonable Customer Conduct Policy that will be a valuable part of that framework.
Council has considered good practice in complaints management and taken particular note of the approach taken by the New South Wales (NSW) Ombudsman who define unreasonable conduct “as any behaviour by a person which, because of its nature or frequency, raises substantial health, safety, resource or equity issues for the people involved in the complaint process”.[1]
It is proposed that going forward, Council considers the individual circumstances of unreasonable customer conduct (UCC) and provides reasonable and proportionate responses that are designed to manage the impacts of the conduct as well as resolve any underlying or substantive issue.
Council’s response to UCC should, as far as is practicable, allow the individual or group involved in the UCC to continue to communicate with Council in a controlled and appropriate manner which will support Council’s zero tolerance approach to unreasonable behaviour.
Nothing in the proposed policy restricts Council’s ability to take any appropriate legal or other action where the circumstances permit, such as where the UCC involves an imminent threat to the mental or physical health or well-being of another customer, councillor, council officer or volunteer, or the failure to obey any lawful instruction.
Although customers/complainants who behave unreasonably are very few in number, their behaviour can have profound effects on Council resources and efficiency levels, and the productivity, safety and wellbeing of its staff.
The NSW Ombudsman’s Office advises that UCC can take up approximately 25-30% of an organisation’s resources – in some cases this can be a large amount of an organisation’s complaint handling resources, as well as the time and attention of senior managers.[2]
Further, UCC can cause significant resourcing problems for organisations that are forced to substantially and unreasonably divert resources away from other complaint management functions, including serving other members of community. UCC can be a major source of stress for the staff members and all persons involved – affecting their right to dignity, physical and emotional safety and wellbeing as well as affecting their work performance – in some cases. This in turn can result in increases in the number of stress related sick-leave applications and workers’ compensation claims that are made by staff members, which can create a duty of care and workplace health and safety issues for employers.
The aim of the proposed policy is to ensure all Council staff:
· Feel confident and supported in taking action to manage UCC.
· Act fairly, consistently, honestly and appropriately when responding to UCC.
· Are aware of their roles and responsibilities in relation to the management of UCC and how this policy will operate.
Council has established a Complaints Management Framework in accordance with sections 268 of the Local Government Act 2009, 306 of the Local Government Regulation 2012, 65 of the Human Rights Act 2019, 166 of the Information Privacy Act 2009 and Ministerial Guidelines made under the Right to Information Act 2009 from which this policy has been developed and was recognised as a requirement for best practice in both complaints and effective customer management.
During the consultation phase it was identified that two (2) other current Library Services’ policies existed to support Council managing UCC behaviours.
The proposed UCC Policy has been drafted to guide all Council officers and councillors to effectively identify and manage UCC in a fair, consistent, transparent and appropriate way.
This policy covers UCC across the full range of Council services and via all communication channels, including but not limited to, face to face, telephone, mail, email, letters to the media, and social media.
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the legislative provisions of the
Local Government Regulation 2012.
Council’s responsibilities to eliminate or reduce risks to mental and physical health and safety under Work Health and Safety legislation and ensure that resources are allocated equitably, are recognised as a fundamental consideration when dealing with UCC.
If Council does not recognise the need to manage UCC, the negative impacts on Council resources as outlined in the background of this report, will continue.
There are no financial implications associated with the adoption of the draft Unreasonable Customer Conduct Policy as per Attachment 1.
The community have not been engaged with the proposed Unreasonable Customer Conduct Policy.
When adopted the Unreasonable
Customer Conduct Policy, will repeal the existing Ipswich Library Acceptable
Behaviour Policy (Attachment 2) and the Ipswich Library Customer Exclusion
Policy, (Attachment 3). Accordingly, the General Manager, Community,
Cultural and Economic Development Department has been a key stakeholder in the
development of this new policy as well as other senior Community, Cultural and
Economic Development staff.
The Executive Leadership Team was consulted and endorsed the formal adoption of the proposed policy and the repeal of the two (2) Library Services Policies. The Mayor and councillors have also been briefed on the proposed policy and recommendations contained in this report.
The proposed UCC Policy has been drafted to guide all Council officers to effectively identify and manage UCC in a fair, consistent, transparent and appropriate way.
This policy covers UCC across the full range of Council services and via all communication channels, including but not limited to, face to face, telephone, mail, email, letters to the media, and social media.
Further the UCC Policy and its supporting Procedure will ensure that Council is following best practice by identifying UCC and recognising that it is the behaviour that is being labelled in this instance and not the customer/complainant.
1. |
Unreasonable Customer Conduct Policy ⇩ |
2. |
Ipswich Libraries Acceptable Behaviour policy ⇩ |
3. |
Ipswich Libraries Customer Exclusion policy ⇩ |
Dianne Nikora
Integrity and Complaints Manager
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Angela Harms
Corporate Governance Manager
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Anthony Dunleavy
Manager, Legal and Governance (General Counsel)
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Sonia Cooper
General Manager Corporate Services
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
Growth Infrastructure and Waste Committee NO. 2021(01)
11 February 2021
Report of the Growth Infrastructure and Waste Committee
for the Council
COUNCILLORS’ ATTENDANCE: Mayor Teresa Harding (Chairperson); Councillors Paul Tully, Sheila Ireland, Jacob Madsen, Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle, Andrew Fechner, Kate Kunzelmann, Russell Milligan and Nicole Jonic
COUNCILLOR’S APOLOGIES: Nil
OFFICERS’ ATTENDANCE: Chief Executive Officer (David Farmer), Acting General Manager Infrastructure and Environment (Sean Madigan), Animal Management Operations Manager (John Pukallus), Infrastructure Stakeholder Manager (Sharna Luscombe), General Manager Planning and Regulatory Services (Peter Tabulo), General Manager Corporate Services (Sonia Cooper), Chief Financial Officer (Jeff Keech), General Manager, Community, Cultural and Economic Development (Ben Pole), Manager Infrastructure Strategy (Tony Dileo), Manager, Assets and Portfolio (Cathy Murray), Manager, Economic and Community Development (Cat Matson), Manager Procurement (Richard White), Manager, Development Planning (Brett Davey), Senior Property Officer Acquisitions and Disposals (Alicia Rieck), Media and Communications Manager (Darrell Giles), Theatre Technician (Harrison Cate)
OTHER ATTENDANCE: Advisor to the Minister (Steve Greenwood)
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST IN MATTERS ON THE AGENDA
Nil |
BUSINESS OUTSTANDING
Nil |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
1. Confirmation of the Minutes of the Meeting held on 3 December 2020 |
DECISION Moved by Councillor Andrew Fechner: Seconded by Councillor Russell Milligan: That the Minutes of the Meeting held on 3 December 2020 be confirmed.
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Tully Ireland Madsen Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
OFFICERS’ REPORTS
2. Contract Variation Report - Extension of Contract 13420 Kerbside Recycling This is a report recommending a variation to enable the extension of existing Contract 13420 Kerbside Recycling Services with Visy Paper Pty Ltd “Visy” for a period of up to ten (10) months until February 2022. This will ensure the continuity of essential services to the community in order to minimise waste disposal to landfill and maximise the recovery of resources for reuse or recycling, while the Council undertakes a review of future contracting options. The current contract for weekly
Kerbside Recycling was subject to a Tender Consideration Plan (TCP) endorsed
by Council in early 2019. The contract commenced on 1 May 2019 with the
option to extend for up to a further The current contract expires on
30 April 2021. The purpose of this report is to enable Council to vary
the contract to include an additional extension of the contractual
arrangement with Visy Paper Pty Ltd “Visy” for a period of up to |
DECISION Moved by Councillor Andrew Fechner: Seconded by Councillor Nicole Jonic: A. That Council resolve to extend the contract with Visy Paper Pty Ltd for Household Recycling for a period of up to ten (10) months, with an additional cost of $805,500 (GST Exclusive), under the same terms and conditions as the current agreement with Visy Paper Pty Ltd. B. That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to negotiate and finalise the terms of the contract extension to be executed by Council, and to do any other acts necessary to implement Council’s decision in accordance with section 13(3) of the Local Government Act 2009 (Qld). |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Tully Ireland Madsen Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
3. IED Capital Portfolio Financial Performance Report - December 2020 This is a report concerning Infrastructure and Environment Department’s (IED) capital portfolio financial performance for the period ending 31 December 2020. |
DECISION Moved by Councillor Andrew Fechner: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: That the monthly financial performance report on the Infrastructure and Environment Department’s Capital Portfolio Budget for 2020-2021 be received and the contents noted. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Tully Ireland Madsen Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
4. Ipswich Inner CBD Cycle Network Corridor Plan The purpose of the Ipswich Inner CBD Cycle Network Corridor Plan was to assess bikeway route alignment options and configurations in the Ipswich City Centre and for the preferred alignment, develop a high level concept design and a construction order of cost. This planning will be used to inform Council’s capital portfolio development, investment planning and development assessment activities and may be used for future applications to the Queensland Government Cycle Network Local Government Grants Program.
|
“The attachment/s to this report are confidential in accordance with section 275(1)(g) of the Local Government Regulation 2012.” |
DECISION Moved by Councillor Andrew Fechner: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: A. That the preferred alignment and configuration of the Ipswich Inner CBD Cycle Network, as outlined in the report by the Senior Transport Planner dated 5 January 2021, be adopted and used to inform future planning and detailed design activities. B. That the footprint of the adopted alignment and configuration of the Ipswich Inner CBD Cycle Network (refer Recommendation A above) be protected through Council’s strategic corridor preservation, tactical property acquisition and development assessment activities. C. That the properties located adjacent to the footprint of the adopted alignment and configuration of the Ipswich Inner CBD Cycle Network (refer Recommendation A above) be flagged as an interest to Council for future strategic active transport purposes in Council’s property database. D. That the ‘order of cost’ identified in the report by the Senior Transport Planner dated 5 January 2021 for the preferred alignment and configuration of the Ipswich Inner CBD Cycle Network (refer Recommendation A above) be noted and considered for future investment programming activities. E. That the communication strategy identified in the report by the Senior Transport Planner dated 5 January 2021 be further developed and implemented for the Ipswich Inner CBD Cycle Network.
|
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Tully Ireland Madsen Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
5. Community Cat Program - Rosewood Pilot In July 2020 Council considered a request from the Australian Pet Welfare Foundation to partner with them in a pilot de-sexing and community education program. While Council declined the request at the time, the Foundation instituted its own trial program in the suburb of Rosewood, in full knowledge of Council officers. The outcomes of the trial, in summary are positive, with strong support from the residents of Rosewood, as well as the statistics showing that a reasonable number of animals were dealt with by the Foundation and the feral cat issue is being managed. There is the prospect of the Program being extended and such would generally have the support of officers.
|
“The attachment/s to this report are confidential in accordance with section 275(1)(i) of the Local Government Regulation 2012.” |
DECISION Moved by Councillor Russell Milligan: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: That Council receive and note the report on the Community Cat Program -Rosewood Pilot. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Tully Ireland Madsen Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
6. Planning and Environment Court Action Status Report This is a report concerning a status update with respect to current Planning and Environment Court actions associated with development planning applications. |
DECISION Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Nicole Jonic: That the report be received and the contents noted. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Tully Ireland Madsen Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
7. Exercise Of Delegation Report This is a report concerning applications that have been determined by delegated authority for the period 23 November 2020 to 21 January 2021. |
DECISION Moved by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: Seconded by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: That the report be received and the contents noted. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Tully Ireland Madsen Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
NOTICES OF MOTION
8. Notice of Motion - Exemption for Waste Collection Fee - Purga Aboriginal Cemetery This is a notice of motion submitted by Councillor Sheila Ireland concerning an exemption fee for waste collection for the Purga Aboriginal Cemetery.
Councillor Sheila Ireland gave notice of her intention to move the following motion at Council’s Growth Infrastructure and Waste Committee of 11 February 2021: |
DECISION Moved by Councillor Sheila Ireland: Seconded by Councillor Jacob Madsen: That Council investigate providing an exemption for the waste collection fee for the Purga Aboriginal Cemetery located on Carmichaels Road, Purga and provide a report back to the next Growth, Infrastructure and Waste Committee meeting to be held on 11 March 2021.
Further information to support the Notice of Motion:
The Purga Aboriginal Cemetery is a Reserve and the Trustees of the property are Purga Elders & Descendants Aboriginal Corporation. As a cemetery they are exempt from general rates and the fire levy, however, they are not exempt from Utility Charges. The Trustees have advised that they believe people travelling to and from Hardings Paddock are using the bin as there are no rubbish facilities at Hardings Paddock. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Tully Ireland Madsen Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
9. Notice of Motion - Overgrown council parks, reserves and footpaths This is a notice of motion submitted by Councillor Andrew Fechner concerning overgrown Council parks, reserves and footpaths. Councillor Andrew Fechner gave notice of his intention to move the following motion at the Growth, Infrastructure and Waste Committee of 11 February 2021: |
DECISION Moved by Councillor Andrew Fechner: Seconded by Councillor Russell Milligan:
A. That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to take the immediate action required to clear the backlog of overgrown council open spaces including making required budget amendments. B. That a report be prepared which includes: 1. An update on council’s mowing activities over the 2020-2021 summer season and how these activities compare to previous summers. 2. The number of complaints received by council about overgrown council open spaces over the 2020-2021 summer season. 3. Information on the number of council staff and contractors engaged to respond to overgrown council open spaces over the 2020-2021 summer season. 4. Options which may enhance council’s response to high-growth periods including consideration of seasonal variations to established mowing schedules. C. That the report be presented to a future meeting of the Growth, Infrastructure and Waste Committee to ensure that any required changes are in place prior to the 2021-2022 summer season. Background Information:
Over the last several weeks, significant community concerns have been raised about the overgrown condition of many council parks, reserves and footpaths following recent rain.
It is appreciated that Ipswich has experienced a relatively wet summer and it is acknowledged that council staff have worked diligently to mow and maintain parks across the city.
However, it is important that council endeavour to ensure that during high-growth periods, our open spaces are maintained to a level which meets community expectations in a cost effective manner. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Harding Nil Tully Ireland Madsen Doyle Fechner Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
MATTERS ARISING
Nil |
PROCEDURAL MOTIONS AND FORMAL MATTERS
The meeting commenced at 9.00 am.
The meeting closed at 9.26 am.
Council Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
Governance and Transparency Committee NO. 2021(01)
11 February 2021
Report of the Governance and Transparency Committee
for the Council
COUNCILLORS’ ATTENDANCE: Councillor Jacob Madsen (Chairperson); Councillors Russell Milligan, Mayor Teresa Harding, Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle, Kate Kunzelmann and Nicole Jonic, Andrew Fechner (Observer)
COUNCILLOR’S APOLOGIES: Nil
OFFICERS’ ATTENDANCE: Chief Executive Officer (David Farmer), General Manager Corporate Services (Sonia Cooper), Chief Financial Officer (Jeff Keech), Property Services Manager (Brett McGrath), Senior Property Officer (Acquisitions and Disposals)(Alicia Rieck, Manager Procurement (Richard White), Acting General Manager Infrastructure and Environment (Sean Madigan), General Manager Planning and Regulatory Services (Peter Tabulo), General Manager, Community Cultural and Economic Development (Ben Pole), Manager, Marketing and Promotion (Carly Gregory), Manager Economic Development (Cat Matson), Manager, Infrastructure Strategy (Tony Dileo), Manager, Assets and Portfolio Management (Cathy Murray), Integrity and Complaints Manager (Dianne Nikora), Manager, Legal and Governance and General Counsel (Tony Dunleavy), Community Development Manager (Melissa Dower), ICT Digital Transformation Manager (Ian Jones), Media and Communications Manager (Darrell Giles), Theatre Technician (Harrison Cate)
OTHER ATTENDANCE: Advisor to the Minister (Steve Greenwood)
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST IN MATTERS ON THE AGENDA
Nil |
BUSINESS OUTSTANDING
Nil |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
1. Report - Governance and Transparency
Committee No. 2020(05) of This is the report of the
Governance and Transparency Committee No. 2020(05) of |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Nicole Jonic: That the report of the Governance
and Transparency Committee No. 2020(05) of |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Madsen Nil Milligan Harding Doyle Kunzelmann Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
OFFICERS’ REPORTS
2. Annual Maintenance Renewal - 12D model software This is a report seeking a Council resolution by Ipswich City Council (Council) to continue the annual maintenance renewal for Council’s 12D Model Software with 12D Solutions Pty Ltd. This proprietary software was first purchased in April 2008 through a one supplier quote process and its continued use is considered essential to Council. 12D Model Software is an embedded, critical and widely used software used by the Infrastructure and Environment Department for terrain modelling, surveying and civil engineering applications. A resolution of Council is sought to allow the continuation of the renewal of the annual maintenance (Licences are owned by Council) with 12D Solutions Pty Ltd for a further three (3) year term covering the period 01/05/2021 to 30/04/2024, for an estimated total cost of sixty seven thousand and fifty dollars ($67,050) excluding GST over the full three (3) year period. |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Mayor Teresa Harding: A. That pursuant to s235 (b) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 (Regulation) Council resolve it is satisfied that the exception under s235(b) of the Regulation applies and because of the specialised nature of the services which are sought, namely 12D Model Software services and maintenance, it would be impractical or disadvantageous for Council to invite quotes or tenders. B. That Council enter into a contract with 12D Solutions Pty Ltd for the 12D Model Software for a period of three (3) years until 30 April 2024, for an estimated total cost of sixty seven thousand and fifty dollars ($67,050) excluding GST over the full three (3) year period. C. That under s257 (1) of the Local Government Act, Council delegate the power to the Chief Executive Officer to be authorised to negotiate and finalise the terms of the contract to be executed by Council, (including all annual renewals), and to do any other acts necessary to implement Council’s decision. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Madsen Nil Milligan Harding Doyle Kunzelmann Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
3. Extension of Contract - 16116 Zip Water Systems Parts and Services This is a report recommending an extension of the Parts and Service Contract with Zip Heaters (Aust) Pty Ltd, to provide continued parts and servicing of the existing Zip Water Systems installed throughout Council’s facilities. The Council is requested to consider and resolve that the exception set out in section 235(a) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 applies due to the Zip Heaters (Aust) ‘Water Systems' proprietary nature. The estimated value of the arrangement is estimated to be thirty-six thousand dollars ($36,000) excl GST per annum, for three (3) years to December 2023 for the estimated sum of one hundred and eight thousand dollars ($108,000) excluding GST. |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: Seconded by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: A. That Council resolve it is satisfied that the exception in s235(a) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 (Regulation) applies and that Zip Heater (Aust) is the only supplier reasonably available to it to provide Parts and Services for Zip Heater (Aust) Water Systems for the following reason: 1. Due to the proprietary nature of the Zip Heaters (Aust) Water, they are the only supplier to provide parts and servicing for their proprietary systems, which are installed throughout the Council’s Facilities. B. That Council enter into a contract with Zip Heater (Aust) for the provision of Parts and Services for Zip Heater (Aust) Water Systems for a period of two (2) years with the option to extend for an additional one (1) year. C. That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to negotiate and finalise the terms of the contract to be executed by Council and to do any other acts necessary to implement Council’s decision in accordance with section 13(3) of the Local Government Act 2009. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Madsen Nil Milligan Harding Doyle Kunzelmann Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
4. Acquisition of Land for INF02414 Road Purposes Redbank Plains Road Stage 3 This is a report concerning the acquisition of land for road purposes for the Redbank Plains Road Stage 3 Project (The Project).
|
“The attachment/s to this report are confidential in accordance with section 275(1)(h) of the Local Government Regulation 2012.” |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Mayor Teresa Harding: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: A. That Council having considered the details contained in this report, support the acquisition for strategic road purposes, of the area of land identified in Attachment 1 of this report, described as part of Lot 254 on SP283566 located at 389 Redbank Plains Road, Redbank Plains (“the Land”) by way of resumption agreement with (“ the Landowner”). If Council fail to reach an agreement with the landowner for the acquisition of the land, recommendations B, D and E will apply. B. That Council resolve to exercise its power as a constructing authority for strategic road purposes, under the Acquisition of Land Act 1967, and take the land (by way of resumption) as the area of land being identified in Attachment 1 of this report, described as part of Lot 254 on SP283566 and located at 389 Redbank Plains Road, Redbank Plains and (“the Land”). C. That Council resolve under s257(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 2009 to delegate the power to the Chief Executive Officer to be authorised to negotiate any agreement with the landowner for the amount of compensation payable by Council under any resumption agreement. D. That Council resolve under s257(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 2009 to delegate the power to the Chief Executive Officer to be authorised to take the land for strategic road purposes (by way of resumption) described as part of Lot 254 on SP283566 located at 389 Redbank Plains Road, Redbank Plains (“the Land”) on behalf of Council, in its capacity as a constructing authority under the Acquisition of Land Act 1967. E. That Council be informed of progress in relation to the acquisition of the land. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Madsen Nil Milligan Harding Doyle Kunzelmann Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
5. Acquisition of Land and Drainage Easement for INF03206 Mary and William Streets Blackstone Traffic Signalisation Project This is a report concerning the acquisition of land for road purposes and an easement for drainage purposes for the delivery of the Mary and William Streets Blackstone traffic signalisation project.
|
“The attachment/s to this report are confidential in accordance with section 275(1)(h) of the Local Government Regulation 2012.” |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: Seconded by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: A. That Council having considered the details contained in this report support the acquisition for strategic road purposes of the areas of the following properties (shown in Attachments 1-3) (“The Land”) by way of Resumption Agreement with the owner (“The Landowner”) being: Part of Lot 12 on RP209507, 67 Mary Street, Blackstone; Part of Lot 39 on RP110739, 101 Mary Street, Blackstone; and Part of Lot 1 on RP208883, 11 William Street, Blackstone. If Council fails to reach an agreement with the landowner for the acquisition of the land, Recommendations C and D will apply. B. That
Council having considered the details contained in this report, support the
acquisition of an easement for drainage purposes, of the area of land
identified in Attachment 3 (“The Land”), described as Part of Lot
1 on RP208883 located at If Council fails to reach an agreement with the landowner for the acquisition of the land, Recommendations C and D will apply C. That Council resolve to exercise its power as a constructing authority for strategic road purposes and drainage purposes, under the Acquisition of Land Act 1967, and take the land and/or easement described in Recommendations A and B of this report dated 10 January 2021, by way of resumption. D. That Council resolve under s257(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 2009 to delegate the power to the Chief Executive Officer to be authorised to take the land and/or easement on behalf of Council, in its capacity as a constructing authority under the Acquisition of Land Act 1967. Council for the following purposes: · Strategic road purposes (by way of resumption) as described in Recommendation A; and · Easement for drainage purposes (by way of resumption) as described in Recommendation B. E. That Council be informed of progress in relation to the acquisition of the land. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Madsen Nil Milligan Harding Doyle Kunzelmann Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
6. Acquisition of Drainage Easements for INF04089 Local Drainage Rehabilitaion Project Pryde and Hume Street, Woodend This is a report concerning the acquisition of easements for drainage purposes for the Local Drainage Rehabilitation Project at Pryde and Hume Street Woodend.
|
“The attachment/s to this report are confidential in accordance with section 275(1)(h) of the Local Government Regulation 2012.” |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: A. That
Council having considered the details contained in this report support the
acquisition of easement for drainage purposes of the areas of the following
properties (shown in Attachment 1-13) (“The Land”) by way of
Resumption Agreement with the owner (“The Landowner”) being: Part of Lot 2 on RP92778, 6 Hume Street, Woodend; Part of Lot 6 on RP24234, 8 Hume Street, Woodend; Part of Lot 5 on RP24234, 10 Hume Street, Woodend; Part of Lot 4 on RP24234, 12 Hume Street, Woodend; Part of Lot 18 on RP24234, 20 Hume Street, Woodend; Part of Lot 19 on RP24234, 22 Hume Street, Woodend; Part of Lot 20 on RP24234, 24 Hume Street Woodend; Part of Lot 15 on RP24234, 9 Pryde Street, Woodend; Part of Lot 4 on RP60842, 9A Pryde Street Woodend; Part of Lot 16 on RP24234, 11 Pryde Street, Woodend; Part of Lot 17 on RP24234, 13 Pryde Street, Woodend; Part of Lot 26 on RP24234, 18 Pryde Street, Woodend; Part of Lot 1 on RP92778, 57 O’Sullivan Street Woodend. If Council fails to reach an agreement with the landowner for the acquisition of the easement, Recommendations B and D will apply. B. That Council resolve to exercise its power as a constructing authority for drainage purposes, under the Acquisition of Land Act 1967, and take the easements (by way of resumption) as described in Recommendation A of this report dated 10 January 2021. C. That Council resolve under s257(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 2009 to delegate the power to the Chief Executive Officer to be authorised to negotiate any agreement with the landowner for the amount of compensation payable by Council under any resumption agreement. D. That Council resolve under s257(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 2009 to delegate the power to the Chief Executive Officer to be authorised to take the easements for drainage purposes (by way of resumption) as described in Recommendation A of this report dated 10 January 2021 on behalf of Council, in its capacity as a constructing authority under the Acquisition of Land Act 1967. E. That Council be informed of progress in relation to the acquisition of the easements. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Madsen Nil Milligan Harding Doyle Kunzelmann Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
7. Unreasonable Customer Conduct Policy This report provides recommendations for the adoption of a new Unreasonable Customer Conduct (UCC) policy and the repeal of two existing Library Services policies in relation to UCC behaviours. |
Recommendation
A. That the policy "Ipswich Libraries – Acceptable Behaviour Policy" as detailed in Attachment 1 of the report by the Library Services Manager dated 15 December, as per Recommendation B of Item No. 3 of the Policy and Administration Advisory Committee No. 2018(01) of 13 February 2018, adopted at the Council Ordinary Meeting on 27 February 2018, be repealed.
B. That the policy "Ipswich Libraries – Customer Exclusion Policy" as detailed in Attachment 2 of the report by the Library Services Manager dated 15 December, as per Recommendation C of Item No. 3 of the Policy and Administration Advisory Committee No. 2018(01) of 13 February 2018, adopted at the Council Ordinary Meeting on 27 February 2018, be repealed.
C. That the policy "Unreasonable Customer Conduct" as detailed in Attachment 3, of the report by the Integrity and Complaints Manager dated 27 January 2021, be adopted. |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann:
That this matter be deferred for consideration at the next Council Ordinary Meeting scheduled for 25 February 2021, with revision to the wording of the policy to clarify the intent. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Madsen Nil Milligan Harding Doyle Kunzelmann Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
8. Smart City Program At the Special Council Meeting of 27 April 2020, Council resolved to adopt a Mayoral Minute by the new Mayor concerning the establishment of the Ipswich City Council Transparency and Integrity Hub. Recommendation D of that Mayoral Minute was to ‘Prepare a report to Council (and for public viewing) on the Smart City Program including detailed project financial data for the past five years and the community outcomes delivered. In July 2020 as part of the live Ipswich City Council Transparency and Integrity Hub, Council published a summary and detailed financial records related to the Smart City Program. This report provides relevant information on the Ipswich Smart City Program going back to its inception in the 2015-2016 financial year. |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Mayor Teresa Harding: Seconded by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: That the report be received and the contents noted.
|
VARIATION TO MOTION: Mayor Teresa Harding proposed a
variation to the motion: That a report on the Smart City Program be provided to the next Governance and Transparency Committee including: · detailed project financial data with a breakdown of costs by project level and category ie consultancies, travel, accommodation and deputations. · information incurred by council entities - Ipswich City Enterprises Pty Ltd, Ipswich City Enterprises Investments Pty Ltd, Ipswich City Properties Pty Ltd and Ipswich City Developments Pty Ltd. · operational costs and capital costs including the value of these assets. · community outcomes delivered – value that ratepayers have received for the $4.6 million.
The seconder of the original motion agreed to the proposed variation. |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Mayor Teresa Harding: Seconded by Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle: A. That
the report be received and the contents noted. B. That a report on the Smart City Program be provided to the next Governance and Transparency Committee scheduled for 11 March 2021 including: · detailed project financial data with a breakdown of costs by project level and category ie consultancies, travel, accommodation and deputations. · information incurred by council entities - Ipswich City Enterprises Pty Ltd, Ipswich City Enterprises Investments Pty Ltd, Ipswich City Properties Pty Ltd and Ipswich City Developments Pty Ltd. · operational costs and capital costs including the value of these assets. · Community outcomes delivered – value that ratepayers have received for the $4.6 million. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Madsen Nil Milligan Harding Doyle Kunzelmann Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
NOTICES OF MOTION
Nil |
MATTERS ARISING
Nil |
PROCEDURAL MOTIONS AND FORMAL MATTERS
The meeting commenced at 9.41 am.
The meeting closed at 10.08 am.
Council Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
Community, Culture, Arts and Sport Committee NO. 2021(01)
11 February 2021
Report of the Community, Culture, Arts and Sport Committee
for the Council
COUNCILLORS’ ATTENDANCE: Councillor Andrew Fechner (Chairperson); Mayor Teresa Harding, Councillors Kate Kunzelmann, Jacob Madsen and Nicole Jonic and Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle (Observer)
COUNCILLOR’S APOLOGIES: Nil
OFFICERS’ ATTENDANCE: Chief Executive Officer (David Farmer), General Manager Community, Cultural and Economic Development (Ben Pole), General Manager Corporate Services (Sonia Cooper), Manager, Economic and Community Development (Cat Matson), Community Development Manager (Melissa Dower), Acting General Manager Infrastructure and Environment (Sean Madigan), Manager Marketing and Promotion (Carly Gregory), Media and Communications Manager (Darrell Giles) and Theatre Technician (Harrison Cate)
OTHER ATTENDANCE: Advisor to the Minister (Steve Greenwood)
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST IN MATTERS ON THE AGENDA Nil
|
BUSINESS OUTSTANDING Nil
|
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
1. Report - Community, Culture, Arts and Sport
Committee No. 2020(05) of This is the report of the Community,
Culture, Arts and Sport Committee |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: Seconded by Mayor Teresa Harding: That the report of the Community,
Culture, Arts and Sport Committee |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Fechner Nil Kunzelmann Harding Madsen Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
OFFICERS’ REPORTS
2. 2021 Ipswich Art Awards Program This is a report concerning the proposed program of activity to be delivered as the 2021 Ipswich Arts Awards. |
Recommendation Moved by Mayor Teresa Harding: That Council endorse the program of activity to be delivered as the 2021 Ipswich Art Awards.
|
VARIATION TO MOTION:
Mayor Teresa Harding proposed a variation to the motion:
That the cost of the program be included in the recommendation.
The seconder agreed to the proposed variation. |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Mayor Teresa Harding: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: That Council endorse the $20,000 program of activity to be delivered as the 2021 Ipswich Art Awards. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Fechner Nil Kunzelmann Harding Madsen Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
3. Welcoming Cities Membership Ipswich City Council has been invited to join the Welcoming Cities network. Welcoming Cities is a national initiative that supports local councils to achieve their social inclusion objectives. The Welcoming Cities network consists of councils and other organisations with an interest in social inclusion and cohesion to share knowledge, create partnerships and celebrate success (Attachment 1). Ipswich is a diverse community and the value of community inclusion is consistent across Council, from Advance Ipswich (published) to the draft Community Development Strategy and draft iFuture Corporate Plan (both to be adopted later this year). Membership to the Welcoming Cities network provides credence to that commitment to inclusion and provides council with access to a community of practice, accreditation and other forms of support to strengthen our approach to inclusion. A condition of membership of Welcoming Cities is Mayoral or CEO endorsement (Attachment 2). Therefore this report outlines the benefits and obligations of membership and seeks the endorsement of this committee and then Council, to join and officially become a ‘Welcoming City’. |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Mayor Teresa Harding: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: A. That Council join and participate in the Welcoming Cities Network to the value of $5,000 for a 12 month membership; a national network of cities committed to nurturing communities where everyone can belong and participate in social, economic and civic life. B. That Council endorse the work required to become a Welcoming City by undertaking the first three steps in the formal process: i. Commit to Welcome – a formal commitment demonstrated by the Mayor’s signature and submission of the official Commitment Form; ii. Community Welcome – develop messaging and communications that highlight unity and shared values, demonstrating that diverse voices are listened to and celebrated; iii. Plan for welcome – consider existing policies and strategies and identify new opportunities to embed welcoming and inclusion across the organisation and for the community. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Fechner Nil Kunzelmann Harding Madsen Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
4. Ipswich City Heart Cabs Review Ipswich City Heart Cabs (ICHC) is a community transport program commenced in 2010 to help address the issue of social isolation in the community. ICHC funded taxi-fares for eligible residents to local shopping centres. In the eleven (11) years since the program was commenced, many other programs have entered the market that better address community transport needs. Based on the findings of a report commissioned by council, it is recommended that the program be discontinued, users are redirected to other community transport options and funding allocated to other programs to better address social isolation. This report provides a summary of the history of the program, background on the program review and seeks Council’s endorsement of the recommendations |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: Seconded by Mayor Teresa Harding: A. That the attached report, ‘Ipswich City Heart Cab Review’ be received and the contents noted. B. That the three (3) recommendations contained within the report be endorsed by council. Those recommendations being: i. The current form of the Ipswich City Heart Cabs Program be discontinued;
ii. Council officers develop a communication and change management program to effectively discontinue the current form of the Ipswich City Heart Cabs Program; and iii. Council officers investigate opportunities for reallocation of funds to more effectively achieve the outcomes of the Ipswich City Heart Cabs Program. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Fechner Nil Kunzelmann Harding Madsen Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
5. Event Sponsorship - The Gathering This is a report concerning an event sponsorship application by Limestone Events Inc. for support of the Celtic Festival ‘The Gathering’ to be held in May 2021 at Ipswich Turf Club. The application is for a combined cash and in-kind sponsorship valued at $22,000. |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Mayor Teresa Harding: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: A. That Limestone Events Inc. receive $10,000 ex GST cash support for ‘The Gathering’ 2021. B. That Limestone Events Inc. receive the following in-kind support valued at $12,000 ex GST: · Inclusion of a two page feature in Council’s seasonal Quarterly Guide; · Inclusion on the Council funded Mt Ommaney Billboard promoting 2021 ‘Ipswich Festivals’ initiatives; · Erection of (existing) street banners along Brisbane Road to promote the event; · Support from two staff from the City Events team during event delivery. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Fechner Nil Kunzelmann Harding Madsen Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
6. Event Sponsorship - Ipswich Cup This is a report concerning an event sponsorship application by Ipswich Turf Club for support of the Ipswich Cup Race Day in June 2021. The application is for $20,000 ex GST and additional in-kind support of star pickets and covers, rammer and rolls of barrier mesh (all to be returned at no cost to council). |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Mayor Teresa Harding: Seconded by Councillor Nicole Jonic: That the Ipswich Turf Club receive $20,000 ex GST financial support and additional in-kind support of star pickets and covers, rammer and rolls of barrier mesh (all to be returned at no cost to council) for the 2021 Ipswich Cup. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Fechner Nil Kunzelmann Harding Madsen Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
7. Christmas Wonderland Income Disbursement to Local Charities This is a report concerning Christmas Wonderland and the disbursement of funds raised through paid ticketing to local charities. |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Mayor Teresa Harding: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: That Council note that the participating charities will receive the following amounts exclusive of GST: · Roderick Street Community Kindergarten - $5,282.00 · Rosewood and District Support Centre Inc T/A Rosewood Community Centre - $5,030.48 · Young Veterans Ipswich - $5,030.48 · The Message of the Cross Indigenous Corporation - $1,760.67 · Ipswich Hospital Foundation - $16,852.10 · Queensland Youth and Families Support Services Inc. - $5,282.00 |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Fechner Nil Kunzelmann Harding Madsen Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
NOTICES OF MOTION
Nil |
MATTERS ARISING
Nil |
PROCEDURAL MOTIONS AND FORMAL MATTERS
The meeting commenced at 10.34 am.
The meeting closed at 10.59 am.
Council Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
Economic and Industry Development Committee NO. 2021(01)
11 February 2021
Report of the Economic and Industry Development Committee
for the Council
COUNCILLORS’ ATTENDANCE: Councillor Nicole Jonic (Chairperson); Mayor Teresa Harding, Councillors Jacob Madsen, Kate Kunzelmann and Andrew Fechner
COUNCILLOR’S APOLOGIES: Nil
OFFICERS’ ATTENDANCE: Chief Executive Officer (David Farmer), General Manager Community, Cultural and Economic Development (Ben Pole), Acting General Manager Infrastructure and Environment (Sean Madigan), Economic and Community Development Manager (Cat Matson), Media and Communications Manager (Darrell Giles) and Theatre Technician (Harrison Cate)
OTHER ATTENDANCE: Advisor to the Minister (Steve Greenwood)
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST IN MATTERS ON THE AGENDA
Nil |
BUSINESS OUTSTANDING
Nil |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
1. Report - Economic and Industry Development Committee No. 2020(05) of 3 December 2020 This is the report of the Economic
and Industry Development Committee |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Councillor Andrew Fechner: Seconded by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: That the report of the Economic
and Industry Development Committee |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Madsen Nil Harding Kunzelmann Fechner Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
OFFICER’S REPORT
2. Economic and Industry Development Activity Update This is a report concerning the economic and industry development activities being undertaken by council’s Office of Economic Development (OED). Local economic development is a priority for most city councils, yet the activities that drive such development are often difficult to report on in the course of normal council business. Further, executing economic development strategy is a long-game, largely consisting of stakeholder conversations, opportunity identification and matching and influencing policy and decisions of many parties; the tangible outputs not evident until a new building opens or there is a sustained shift in economic indicators. This report outlines the role of a council in driving economic development outcomes, the functions of Ipswich City Council’s OED and highlights key activities underway. |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Councillor Andrew Fechner: Seconded by Mayor Teresa Harding: That the report be received and the contents noted. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Madsen Nil Harding Kunzelmann Fechner Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
NOTICES OF MOTION
Nil |
MATTERS ARISING
Nil |
PROCEDURAL MOTIONS AND FORMAL MATTERS
The meeting commenced at 11.17 am.
The meeting closed at 11.29 am.
Council Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
Environment and Sustainability Committee NO. 2021(01)
11 February 2021
Report of the Environment and Sustainability Committee
for the Council
COUNCILLORS’ ATTENDANCE: Councillor Russell Milligan (Chairperson); Mayor Teresa Harding, Councillors Andrew Fechner, Jacob Madsen and Kate Kunzelmann
COUNCILLOR’S APOLOGIES: Nil
OFFICERS’ ATTENDANCE: Chief Executive Officer (David Farmer), Acting General Manager Infrastructure and Environment (Sean Madigan), General Manager Community, Cultural and Economic Development (Ben Pole), Manager, Economic and Community Development (Cat Matson), Natural Environment and Land Manager (Phil A Smith), Media and Communications Manager (Darrell Giles) and Theatre Technician (Harrison Cate)
OTHER ATTENDANCE: Advisor to the Minister (Steve Greenwood)
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST IN MATTERS ON THE AGENDA
Nil |
BUSINESS OUTSTANDING
Nil |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
1. Report - Environment and Sustainability
Committee No. 2020(05) of This is the report of the Environment
and Sustainability Committee No. 2020(05) of |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Mayor Teresa Harding: Seconded by Councillor Andrew Fechner: That the report of the Environment
and Sustainability Committee No. 2020(05) of |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Milligan Nil Fechner Harding Madsen Kunzelmann
The motion was put and carried. |
OFFICER’S REPORT
2. QUEENSLAND FIRE AND BIODIVERSITY CONSORTIUM ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION This is a report concerning the ongoing annual financial contribution to, and partnership with, the Queensland Fire and Biodiversity Consortium (QFBC) (Previously South East Queensland Fire and Biodiversity Consortium (SEQFBC)), for the 2020-2021 financial year. |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Councillor Kate Kunzelmann: Seconded by Mayor Teresa Harding: That Council resolve to provide a financial contribution of $7,874 (excl. GST), as detailed in the partnership letter from the Queensland Fire and Biodiversity Consortium outlined in Attachment 1, to be funded through the 2020-2021 Enviroplan budget. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Milligan Nil Fechner Harding Madsen Kunzelmann
The motion was put and carried. |
NOTICES OF MOTION
Nil |
MATTERS ARISING
Nil |
PROCEDURAL MOTIONS AND FORMAL MATTERS
The meeting commenced at 11.41 am.
The meeting closed at 11.45 am.
Council Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
Ipswich Central Redevelopment Committee NO. 2021(01)
11 February 2021
Report of the Ipswich Central Redevelopment Committee
for the Council
COUNCILLORS’ ATTENDANCE: Deputy Mayor Marnie Doyle (Chairperson); Mayor Teresa Harding, Councillors Kate Kunzelmann, Russell Milligan and Nicole Jonic
COUNCILLOR’S APOLOGIES: Nil
OFFICERS’ ATTENDANCE: Chief Executive Officer (David Farmer), Acting General Manager Infrastructure and Environment (Sean Madigan), General Manager Community, Cultural and Economic Development (Ben Pole), Project Manager (Greg Thomas), Economic and Community Development Manager (Cat Matson), Media and Communications Manager (Darrell Giles) and Theatre Technician (Harrison Cate)
OTHER ATTENDANCE: Advisor to the Minister (Steve Greenwood)
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST IN MATTERS ON THE AGENDA Nil
|
BUSINESS OUTSTANDING Nil
|
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
1. Report - Ipswich Central Redevelopment
Committee No. 2020(07) of This is the report of the Ipswich
Central Redevelopment Committee No. 2020(07) of |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Councillor Russell Milligan: Seconded by Councillor Nicole Jonic: That the report of the Ipswich
Central Redevelopment Committee No. 2020(07) of |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Doyle Nil Harding Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
OFFICERS’ REPORTS
2. Nicholas Street Precinct Executive Report No. 24 To 31 JANUARY 2021 This is a report concerning Executive Report No. 24 on the Nicholas Street Precinct Program of Works to 31 January 2021. |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Mayor Teresa Harding: Seconded by Councillor Nicole Jonic: That the Nicholas Street Precinct Executive Report No. 24 to 31 January 2021 be received and the contents noted. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Doyle Nil Harding Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
3. Retail Sub-Project Steering Committee Report No. 7 - January 2021 This is a report concerning Report No. 7 (January 2021) from the Retail Sub-project Steering Committee on the status of the leasing program and associated developments with the retail component of the Nicholas Street Precinct redevelopment. |
RECOMMENDATION Moved by Councillor Russell Milligan: Seconded by Councillor Nicole Jonic: That the Retail Sub-project Steering Committee Report No. 7 for January 2021 be received and the contents noted. |
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Councillors: Councillors: Doyle Nil Harding Kunzelmann Milligan Jonic
The motion was put and carried. |
NOTICES OF MOTION
Nil |
MATTERS ARISING
Nil |
PROCEDURAL MOTIONS AND FORMAL MATTERS
The meeting commenced at 11.58 am.
The meeting closed at 12.07 pm.
Council Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
ITEM: 15.1
SUBJECT: Resolution to close public land - 2020-2021 Fire Season fuel reduction program
AUTHOR: Team Leader (Land Management and Natural Area Planning)
DATE: 3 February 2021
This is a report concerning the management of public access and closure of White Rock - Spring Mountain Conservation Estate, Flinders – Goolman Conservation Estate and Mount Grandchester Conservation Estate for reasons of public safety during controlled burning fuel reduction activities and the enactment of powers under Section 10 (1) of Local Law 7.
That Council resolve to exercise the power under section 10(1) of Local Law 7 to close public access to areas of Council’s Natural Area Estates to enable a planned schedule of hazard reduction burns occurring between 26 February 2021 and 30 September 2021 within three Council conservation estates, being White Rock - Spring Mountain Conservation Estate, Flinders – Goolman Conservation Estate, and Mount Grandchester Conservation Estate.
There are no identified conflicts of interest for this report.
Caring for the environment
Council is seeking to properly and lawfully close public access to (areas of) the Natural Area Estates during planned fuel reduction burning in order to be able to take all reasonable measures to mitigate risks, real or potential, to conservation estate visitors, staff and the organisation.
Council has adopted a Temporary Closure of Park Estate or Reserve Procedure (Attachment 1) which is followed in times of fire risk or other emergencies which outlines the process and local laws required. However, in order to properly and lawfully enact and regulate a closure, a temporary and specific resolution covering the location and period is required to exercise powers under section 10 (1) of Local Law No.7 (local law) (Government Controlled Areas and Roads) 2013 (Attachment 2).
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Local Law 7 (Local Government Controlled Areas and Roads)
The fuel reduction program including controlled burns is a fundamental part of the risk and general management planning within the Natural Area Estates. In 2019-2020, there was an unprecedented fire season for many parts of Australia and South East Queensland, following prolonged periods of conditions in the “Catastrophic” risk classification. In response, Council reviewed its fuel management program with an emphasis on the urban/bushland interface areas, primarily within the Springfield Lakes area being identified as a priority.
The 2020-2021 fuel reduction program has 9 planned burns scheduled for the season (i.e. March – September 2021), totalling approximately 310Ha within the White Rock – Spring Mountain Conservation Estate (6 sites – 234.25Ha), Flinders – Goolman Conservation Estate (2 sites – 29.67Ha) and Mount Grandchester Conservation Estate (1 site – 44.7Ha).
It is proposed that in exercising the powers under Local Law 7, Council can take a multi-layered approach to ensuring visitor exclusion of the area whilst fuel reduction burns are taking place. This includes Council staff to be on-site to provide warning information, and the installation of closure signs and barrier fencing. Compliance staff from the Planning and Regulatory Services Department may also be required to take enforcement measures under the recommended Local Laws, and to ensure no members of the public are entering the site against advice and putting themselves or others at risk.
The burn program for the current financial year has been fully budgeted within the Enviroplan budget.
Internal stakeholder discussions have been ongoing with Planning and Regulatory Services Department and the Legal and Governance Branch of Corporate Services Department. Through this it has been concluded that this is the most appropriate course of action.
A Council resolution to exercise the powers under section 10 (1) of Local Law 7 to cover the required closure(s) of ‘White Rock Spring Mountain Conservation Estate’, ‘Flinders – Goolman Conservation’ and ’Mount Grandchester Conservation Estate’ during the planned burn season of the 2020-2021 financial year is deemed necessary, and is therefore recommended to ensure proper lawful closure of the areas in order to properly manage public and staff safety.
1. |
Temporary Closure Park, Estate or Reserve Procedure ⇩ |
2. |
Local Law 7 Local Government Controlled areas and roads ⇩ |
John Young
Team Leader (Land Management and Natural Area Planning)
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Phil A. Smith
Natural Environment and Land Manager
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Kaye Cavanagh
Manager, Environment and Sustainability
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Sean Madigan
Acting General Manager - Infrastructure and Environment
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
ITEM: 15.2
SUBJECT: Public Monuments and Memorials - Assessment of Applications
AUTHOR: Team Lead (Open Space and Facilities)
DATE: 9 February 2021
This is a report concerning three current public monuments and memorials applications which have been received by Council from external community groups. The applications are in the process of being reviewed and assessed.
In the absence of not having active membership for the Ipswich Heritage and Monuments Advisory Committee, these applications are referred to Council for review and consideration.
A. That the report be received and the contents noted.
B. That the Public Monuments and Memorials applications, as detailed in Attachments 3 – 8 of the report by the Team Lead (Open Space and Facilities) dated 9 February 2021, be approved to proceed to the next stage of the application process.
Nil
Managing growth and delivering key infrastructure
Public Monuments and Memorials Policy
At its ordinary meeting on the 16 October 2018, Council endorsed the Public Monuments and Memorials Policy [refer to item 1 tabled at the Planning, Development and Heritage Committee No, 2018(10)], as per Attachment 1. The objective of the Policy is to provide guidance on the assessment and management of requests for the installation of public monuments and memorials (PM&M) on Council owned or managed land. The Policy was due for review in October 2020, however, due to competing priorities this review has not commenced.
Assessing Applications for Public Monuments and Memorials Procedure
Council officers implement the Policy with the guidance of Assessing Applications for Public Monuments and Memorials Procedure (Procedure) which was approved by the former Chief Operating Officer (Works, Parks and Recreation) on the 17 October 2018.
There are several stages within the procedure, and Stage 1 outlines applications for PM&M require assessment by Council officers against the adopted assessment criteria in consultation with Council's Cultural Heritage Coordinator and the Ipswich Heritage and Monuments Advisory Committee (IHMAC). Historically, once passing the stage 1 assessment process, a report has been submitted to Council seeking formal endorsement of the PM&M proposal.
At present, Council does not have an active IHMAC. Expressions of interests for membership on the IHMAC are anticipated to occur in 2021. In the absence of not having active membership for the IHMAC, it is recommended that Council is best placed to represent the communities’ interests through review and consideration of current PM&M applications. Council currently has three (3) PM&M applications requiring approvals at various stages within the assessment process.
Current Public Monument and Memorial Applications
There are currently three outstanding PM&M applications. The below tables (tables 1 to 3) provide information on the status of each application and the current approvals required to progress the PM&M application.
Table 1 – Ipswich RSL Sub-Branch Application
Applicant |
Ipswich RSL Sub Branch
|
Location/s |
Soldiers Memorial Hall (63 Nicholas Street, Ipswich) and Memorial Gardens, Ipswich (61 Nicholas Street, Ipswich)
|
Summary of PM&M application |
November 2021 marks the centenary of the Soldiers Memorial Hall. To commemorate the centenary, the Ipswich RSL Sub Branch are seeking Council’s approval to install the following memorials adjacent to the Soldiers Memorial Hall and in Memorial Gardens, Ipswich;
· Eight (8) memorial stones to commemorate conflicts in which Australian Personnel served; · One (1) commemorative plaque mounted on sand stone plinth; and · Three (3) memorial plinths to commemorate World War 2
Refer to Attachment 3 of this report to view the Ipswich RSL Sub Branch application and Attachment 4 provides the artist impression and locality map. |
Application Status |
The memorial proposals are supported by Council’s Cultural Heritage Coordinator and Department of Environment and Science (DES). Note: The Soldiers Memorial Hall is State Heritage listed. All capital works improvements to the building or within 63 Nicholas Street, Ipswich require approval by DES.
|
Remaining Approval |
Council to consider providing “in principal” support for the proposal. On the basis that the proposal is supported and the applicant is successful with grant funding, Council will be responsible for the planning, design and delivery of the project, hence negating any further approvals by Council. |
Table 2 – Zonta Club of Ipswich Application
Applicant |
Zonta Club of Ipswich
|
Location/s |
Lobley Park, Churchill (243 Warwick Rd, Churchill)
|
Summary of PM&M application |
To commemorate the contribution of the Zonta Club of Ipswich to the local community, the club have proposed the installation of a memorial sculpture at Lobley Park, Churchill. The design of the memorial sculpture reflects the roles of both males and females in family life, and that violence in our community is not acceptable. Refer to Attachment 5 of this report to view the Zonta Club of Ipswich application and Attachment 6 provides the artist impression and locality map.
|
Application Status |
The proposal has previously been supported “in principal” by IHMAC. The applicants preferred design now requires approval to progress to stage 2 of the application process.
|
Remaining Approval |
Council to consider providing approval of the applicants preferred design. |
Table 3 – Brisbane Bangla Language School and Ethnic Schools Association Application
Applicant |
Brisbane Bangla Language School and Ethnic Schools Association (BBLS&ESA)
|
Location/s |
Robelle Domain, Springfield (155 Southern Cross Circuit, Springfield Central)
|
Summary of PM&M application |
To install a monument which promotes the importance of mother languages in a multicultural society, as well as to demonstrate respect to the language martyrs around the world. Refer to Attachment 7 of this report to view the BBLS&ESA application and Attachment 8 provides the locality map.
|
Application Status |
The application has been assessed by Council officers and is deemed to satisfy the policy assessment criteria. The application now requires “in principal” support to progress to stage 2 of the application process.
|
Remaining Approval |
Council to consider providing “in principal” support for the proposal. |
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
The PM&M assessment process is undertaken using existing Council resources and budgets.
The applicants have demonstrated community engagement within their PM&M application, inclusive of letters of support from State and / or Local Members.
Council will undertake community consultation that aligns with the delivery of capital project delivery.
Council currently has three (3) Public Monument and Memorial applications requiring approvals at various stages within the PM&M assessment process. In the absence of not having active membership for the IHMAC, it is recommended that Council is best placed to represent the communities’ interests through review and consideration of the three (3) PM&M applications.
1 |
Public Monuments and Memorials Policy ⇩ |
2 |
Assessing applications for Public Monuments and Memorials
Procedure ⇩ |
3 |
Ipswich RSL Public Monuments and Memorials application ⇩ |
4 |
Ipswich RSL Public Monuments and Memorials application -
Locality Map and Artist impression ⇩ |
5 |
Zonta Club of Ipswich Public Monuments and Memorials
application ⇩ |
6 |
Zonta Club of Ipswich Public Monuments and Memorials
application - Locality map and artist impression ⇩ |
7 |
BBLS&ESA Public Monuments and Memorials Application ⇩ |
8 |
BBLS&ESA Public Monuments and Memorials Application -
Locality map and artist impression ⇩ |
Mark Bastin
Team Lead (Open Space and Facilities)
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Mary Torres
Infrastructure Strategy and Planning Manager
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Tony Dileo
Manager, Infrastructure Strategy
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Sean Madigan
Acting General Manager - Infrastructure and Environment
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
ITEM: 15.3
SUBJECT: Ti Tree Bioenergy Payments - Project Development Process and Governance Framework
AUTHOR: Natural Environment and Land Manager
DATE: 28 January 2021
Executive Summary
This is a report concerning the management and expenditure of the payments received from Ti Tree Bioenergy. Council receives annual payments as per a condition of the development approval. The funds are to be utilised by Council in line with the terms of that condition expressly for the purposes of community and environmental benefit and to offset any impacts from the facility.
This report lists the proposed projects for delivery in 2020-2021 and 2021-2022.
Recommendations
A. That Council endorse the list of prioritised projects for delivery in 2020-2021, using the existing budget of $120,000 that has been allocated in 2020-2021.
B. That Council endorse the list of prioritised projects for delivery in 2021-2022, and that a budget allocation of $320,000 be considered in the operational budget for 2021-2022 to be drawn from the accrued funds of $1,506,614.
RELATED PARTIES
There was no declared conflicts of interest related to this report
Advance Ipswich Theme
Caring for the community
Purpose of Report/Background
On 25 February 2020, Council resolved to repeal a number of previous decisions concerning the allocation and distribution of the Ti Tree Bioenergy Payments in preparation for the development of a new relevant governance and management framework focussing on improved reporting processes and transparency
Council further resolved that a governance framework for the management of the Ti Tree Bioenergy Payments be developed to comprise of an Administrative Directive (Attachment 1), a procedure (Attachment 2), and an assessment criteria for proposed community projects (Attachment 3).
An Internal Working Group was established, under an agreed Terms of Reference (Attachment 4), to develop the governance framework in accordance with the intent and specifics of the planning conditions under which the funds are collected. The group has also assessed and prioritised project proposals received from the community or identified internally in terms of the above intent of the funding.
The governance documents were presented to the Executive Leadership Team and subsequently adopted under the appropriate delegations in November 2020.
This report provides a list of projects that have been identified and proposed by the Willowbank Area (Residents) Group Inc. (WAG) or internally based on the criteria. These projects include but are not limited to the following:
· Amberley Girl Guides grounds landscaped / security camera
· Establishment of a new Koala Bush Reserve in the locale
· Asphalt/Bitumen surface and widening of O’Neills Road and installation of barriers
· Wildlife signs on roadways and facilitated movements around the area
· Continuation of footpath from Warren Court to McHales Way
· Ipswich Safe City Camera at O’Neills Road / Amberley Rosewood Road intersection
· Wildlife corridor from Ebenezer Creek to Bremer River to west of Willowbank
· Partnership with Ipswich Koala Foundation purchase of property for a Koala Reserve and Koala fodder and investigate the use of local tracking collars
· Fencing around Mack Family Park and George Hatchman Bush Reserves
· Koala habitat and corridor restoration and enhancement around the Willowbank area - private grants/public plantings
· Wetland and waterway restoration including waterway barrier removal on Bremer River and Warrill Creek
· Community amenity infrastructure eg: park benches within the local reserves and parks
· Buffer treatment (e.g. vegetation) around the Ti Tree Waste Facility and associated roads
· Local land acquisition for the establishment of new parks and conservation areas and or vegetation buffers
· Establishment of vegetated corridor or bush care reserve(s) in strategic koala locations
· Community walking and cycling area around O'Neill's Road, Ipswich-Amberley Road and Mt Elliot Mine Road.
The following projects have been prioritised for delivery in 2020-2021, to be funded through the existing allocated budget of $120,000 (table 1). This is a nominal annual budget drawn from the overall funding pool (detailed below).
Table 1. Recommended projects 2020-2021 |
|
Projects |
Discussion |
Revegetation in Willowbank area (multiple revegetation projects submitted) |
Planting in Mack Park and investigation of other suitable planting sites. Plantings to enhance/create natural areas and create koala habitat. |
Wildlife signs on roadways and facilitated movements around the area |
Undertake monitoring of koalas and planning in the area and investigate and install appropriate wildlife signage and more broader wildlife movement solutions around the Willowbank/Amberley/Ebenezer Area |
Fencing around Mack Family Park & George Hatchman Bush Reserve |
Undertake site survey of reserves and installation of appropriate fencing for protection of the reserve and wildlife. |
The following projects have been prioritised and proposed for delivery in the 2021-2022 financial year (table 2).
Table 2. Recommended Projects 2021-2022 |
Projects |
Discussion |
Local land acquisition for the establishment of new parks and conservation areas and or vegetation buffers in line with proposals. |
Multiple similar projects have been suggested and revegetation and creation of bush reserve would be a good outcome – multiple benefits scored high on environmental locality criteria |
Continuation of wildlife signage and fauna movement project |
Investigate feasibility and options working with the Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) around fauna passage solutions e.g. crossing points, fencing. Develop a delivery plan. |
Community amenity infrastructure e.g. park benches picnic tables within the local reserves and parks. |
Develop a local plan of sites and potential furniture or options for infrastructure embellishment and delivery |
Feasibility study of community walking and cycling trails around O'Neill's Road, Ipswich-Amberley Road and Mt Elliot Mine Road, including continuation of the footpath from Warren Court to McHales Way |
Community walking and cycling trails around O'Neill's Road, Ipswich-Amberley Road and Mt Elliot Mine Road. |
Wetland and waterway restoration on Bremer River and Warrill Creek. |
Site identification, rehabilitation planning and planting of suitable sites |
Partnership with Ipswich Koala Protection Society (IKPS) for potential purchase of property for a Koala Reserve and Koala fodder and investigate the use of local tracking collars |
Discuss options with IKPS around sites in the locality and data sharing/partnership around local monitoring |
Legal/Policy Basis
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Local Government Act 2009
Planning and Environment Court Act 2016
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
In collecting the funds from Ti Tree, under the terms of the aforementioned conditions, Council enters into an agreement to manage and expend those funds in line with their intended purpose. In not spending these funds or spending them in a manner not aligned with its intent Council is at risk of not meeting the legal requirements of the court order. Furthermore and more broadly the community for which the funding was intended to support are at risk of missing out on an opportunity to offset any potential social or environmental impacts as a result of the Ti Tree Bioenergy facility.
There is potential risk to Council from a probity perspective in issuing payments to a community group, in this instance WAG, outside adopted procurement and community funding policy and legislative guidelines without clear and concise terms and conditions. To mitigate this going forwards Council will seek to enter into a contractual or partnership arrangement with WAG under which they will be asked to provide representative community feedback and input on the proposed projects. Council will work with WAG to ensure this feedback is representative of the broader local community and deals with the impacts of the local facility.
Financial/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
Currently, there are accrued funds to the value of $1,506,614, not including the current pending annual payment. A nominal amount of $120,000 has been allocated from the accrued funds within the 2020-2021 budget for the delivery of projects as listed in Table 1 above. A budget of $320,000 is proposed to be allocated from the remaining accrued funds for the delivery of prioritised projects in 2021-2022. This amount may need to be increased depending on future opportunities, such as the acquisition of bushland reserves or koala habitat within the Willowbank / Ebenezer locality.
The administrative process including project management, assessment and reporting will be funded and managed with current staff and existing operational budgets.
The annual payment to WAG (up to $5,000) will be sourced from consolidated revenue, as it cannot be drawn from the Ti Tree payments under the adopted Administrative Directive and assessment criteria.
An annual financial statement and balance sheet will form part of the progress and program report which will be presented to Council each year. The statement of accounts/balances will be passed to the transparency hub for publication and also provided to Ti Tree at the same interval or more frequently if required.
Future budgets will be determined and proposed as part of the annual project prioritisation process and presented to Council for resolution.
COMMUNITY and OTHER CONSULTATION
An internal working group across the Infrastructure and Environment; Community, Cultural and Economic Development; and Corporate Services Departments has been working on the governance framework prior to and since the Council resolution in February 2020.
Consultation with representatives of Ti Tree Bioenergy and the Willowbank Area (Residents) Group Inc. (WAG) has been undertaken on the process and funding balance.
Council is currently developing a digital version of the project identification form (Attachment 5) which will be made available through Shape Your Ipswich. This will provide an avenue for the community to propose projects to be considered in the annual program. These will be compiled and those that meet the criteria will be presented to WAG each year to provide community input.
Conclusion
A new governance framework to manage the distribution and expenditure of the Ti Tree Bioenergy annual payments has been developed and adopted, and are presented in this report.
A list of prioritised projects for delivery in 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 is presented for Council endorsement. These projects have been assessed and prioritised in accordance with the agreed project assessment criteria.
Details of the funds, progress on projects and the annual works program will be presented to Council by way of a report on an annual basis.
Attachments and Confidential Background Papers
1. |
|
2. |
|
3. |
|
4. |
|
5. |
Phil A. Smith
Natural Environment and Land Manager
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Kaye Cavanagh
Manager, Environment and Sustainability
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Sean Madigan
Acting General Manager - Infrastructure and Environment
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
ITEM: 15.4
SUBJECT: Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program (Round 2) Funding Allocation
AUTHOR: Coordinator - Grant Management
DATE: 2 February 2021
Executive Summary
This is a report concerning a funding commitment of $7.3 million from the Australian Government under the Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program (Round 2).
This funding has been made available to Council in response to COVID-19 as an economic stimulus. Projects funded under this program must be completed by 31 December 2021.
That Council endorse the projects shown in Attachment 1 (Option A) for funding under the Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program (Round 2).
RELATED PARTIES
No Conflicts of interest have been identified.
Advance Ipswich Theme
Managing growth and delivering key infrastructure
Purpose of Report/Background
In October 2020, the Australian Government announced an extension to the Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program with an additional $1 billion committed in Round 2 of the program. Council has been advised that our allocation under this commitment is for $7.3 million.
Conditions of this funding include:
· Eligible project includes projects that are generally available for use by the community, including roads, footpaths, Bikeways and community facilities.
· Council must submit projects for endorsement by the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications prior to work commencing.
· Projects must be completed by 31 December 2021.
Considering the ability of Council to deliver the endorsed projects prior to 31 Dec 2021. It is recommended that the projects shown in Attachment 1 (option A), from the capital program be submitted for endorsement to the Australian Government.
Legal/Policy Basis
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Not Applicable
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
The funding commitment from the Australian Government is on a ‘use it, or lose it’ principle and must be fully expended by 31 December 2021 or the funding commitment is surrendered. All projects identified for submission are already in the delivery pipeline and scheduled for completion before 31 December 2021.
Financial/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
The purpose of the Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program funding is to support local councils to deliver priority local road and community infrastructure projects, supporting jobs and the resilience of local economies to help communities bounce back from the COVID-19 pandemic. As an economic stimulus measure, the intent is that Eligible Funding Recipients undertake infrastructure projects which are additional to projects that they had planned to undertake using their own funds.
Under Round 2 of the program, Council is required to maintain its overall capital spending on roads and community infrastructure, funded by their own revenue, at or above their 2020-2021 capital spending level.
Council’s current capital program meets this funding condition for funding eligibility.
COMMUNITY and OTHER CONSULTATION
The recommended project list has been prepared in conjunction with the Infrastructure & Environment Department and has been based on the deliverability of the projects within the funding window as required.
Wider engagement with stakeholders regarding individual projects is managed through Councils existing processes for capital delivery.
Conclusion
The Australian Government has committed an additional $1 billion nationally towards Round 2 of the Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program as a COVID-19 economic stimulus program.
Ipswich City Council has received an allocation of $7.3 million under this funding round for projects to be completed by 31 December 2021.
The project list as shown in Attachment 1, will be submitted to the Australian Government for formal approval.
Attachments and Confidential Background Papers
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
1. |
Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program -Project Proposal |
Matthew Mulroney
Coordinator - Grant Management
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Joshua Edwards
Acting Manager, Performance
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Barbara Dart
Manager, Performance
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Council Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
ITEM: 15.5
SUBJECT: Naming of Your Places and Spaces - Community Engagement Report
AUTHOR: Engagement Manager
DATE: 10 February 2021
This is a report concerning the “Name Your Places and Spaces” community engagement initiative run on Shape Your Ipswich (August 11 to 30) with the goal of generating ideas from the community to potentially help council finalise the names of nine key places and spaces in the newly redeveloped city heart.
At the September Council meeting, Council determined the names for four of the nine places and spaces (the Precinct itself, the civic space, the new library and laneway 2) with a further two the subject of this report.
Therefore, the following places and spaces are yet to be named.
- Laneway 1 – currently referred to as Icon Alley or Smokers’ Alley
- Ipswich City Council administration building
- The Children’s Library
- The event space in the new ICC administration building
- The balcony connecting to the event space in the ICC administration building
Council officers seek guidance on the naming of the following spaces at the February Council meeting:
- Laneway 1 – currently referred to as Icon Alley or Smokers’ Alley
- The Children’s Library
Results of the “Name Your Places and Spaces” community engagement initiative have been included in this report (below and attached) for the consideration and information of Council.
A. That Council determine the name for Laneway 1 – currently referred to as Icon Alley or Smokers’ Alley.
B. That Council determine the name for the new Children’s Library.
C. That Council finalise the naming of the remaining places and spaces at the March Council meeting.
There are no conflicts of interest to note.
Strengthening our local economy and building prosperity
The key objectives for this engagement were:
· To encourage feedback from the broader Ipswich community in regards to possible names for key precincts, sub-precincts, streets, lanes, assets and event spaces within the Nicholas Street redevelopment
· To position council as a forward-thinking, strategic and community-centric organisation.
· To encourage the broader community to come on the redevelopment ‘journey’ and create a sense of pride and ownership.
· To use council’s Shape Your Ipswich platform as a one-stop-shop to engage with the community so the loop can be closed once the final decision is made by council.
Below
is a summary of all suggestions (noting the number of times each name was
suggested as well as the number of supporting thumbs-ups it received).
1. The overarching precinct (currently known as Nicholas Street, Ipswich Central)
Suggested name |
Why / Rationale |
Contributions |
Thumbs up |
Jagara/Yuggera Place/Precinct |
Local indigenous peoples |
4 |
167 |
Tulmur Place/Precinct/Village |
“Ipswich” in universal Indigenous language |
7 |
149 |
Ipswich City/Central/Town |
Simplicity and easy wayfinding |
15 |
130 |
Jagara/Yuggara Place |
Local Indigenous peoples |
6 |
131 |
Nicholas Street |
Maintain original street name – has been known as Nicholas Street since the first survey map of the city was done |
8 |
60 |
Union Place |
A nod to the history of the original name and a place where people can unite |
2 |
10 |
Town |
Simplicity and easy wayfinding |
1 |
2 |
Digger City River Precinct |
Nod to mining history |
1 |
6 |
Jeff McLean Central |
Local business owner and former Wallaby |
1 |
1 |
Sir Neville Bonner |
Local, first Indigenous member of parliament |
1 |
9 |
Robert Anderson Place |
Local indigenous man that beat world sprint champions in charters towers. |
1 |
17 |
Murrumpi or Djimbalung |
Koala or my people |
1 |
18 |
Limestone Hills Precinct |
|
1 |
6 |
Switch City Plaza |
|
1 |
4 |
Wade Korumba |
-A mix of Anglo Henry Wade surveyor Ipswich + Korumba a word meaning great in the aboriginal language. |
1 |
2 |
Ipswich Central 4 Squares Plaza |
|
1 |
1 |
iConnect |
|
1 |
0 |
The Strada |
Italian for “street” |
1 |
1 |
The Feels of Ipswich |
|
1 |
0 |
Unity |
|
1 |
0 |
Newman |
Local war veteran |
1 |
0 |
2. The civic plaza
Suggested name |
Why / Rationale |
Contributions |
Thumbs up |
Tulmur Place/Square |
“Ipswich” in universal Indigenous language |
15 |
357 |
Trevor Grewar Outlook |
Local identity dedicated to giving back to the Ipswich community |
1 |
516 |
Yagara Place/Plaza |
Traditional Indigenous language |
2 |
26 |
Limestone Plaza |
Original proposed name of Ipswich |
1 |
31 |
Corroboree Connection |
Indigenous cultural space for music, dance and costume |
1 |
2 |
Nicholas Street Plaza/Nicholas Plaza |
Original street name |
3 |
9 |
The Plaza |
|
1 |
5 |
Riverheart Plaza |
The river and the heart of the city combined |
1 |
3 |
Riverslea Plaza |
|
1 |
2 |
Heather Bonner Place |
Local and founder of One People of Australia League |
1
|
2 |
The Oasis |
A place to relax |
1 |
1 |
Don Risson Place |
Local who gave back to the community |
1 |
1 |
People’s Place |
A place for people |
1 |
1 |
Union Place |
A place to come together |
1 |
1 |
Bremer Plaza |
Named after the Bremer river |
1 |
1 |
Gathering Place |
A place to gather |
1 |
0 |
Jeff McLean Central |
Local business owner and former Wallaby |
1 |
0 |
Ipswich City Hub |
A central hub of activity |
1 |
0 |
Ipswich/Ipswich Civic Place/Ipswich Central |
Simplicity and easy wayfinding |
1 |
0 |
Aubonnett Place |
Longest running music school, founder/director Ipswich Orchestras |
1 |
0 |
Connection Place |
A place to connect |
1 |
0 |
3. City (main) library
Suggested name |
Why / Rationale |
Contributions |
Thumbs up |
Ipswich City/Ipswich Central Library |
Simplicity and easy wayfinding |
13 |
650 |
The John Birmingham Library |
Locally-born author |
1 |
34 |
Tulmur Central/Ipswich Tulmur Library |
“Ipswich” in universal Indigenous language |
2 |
16 |
Thomas Shapcott Library |
Locally-born poet, novelist and playwright |
3 |
13 |
Margaret Cook Library |
Local historian |
2 |
9 |
Neville Bonner |
Local Indigenous politician. First Indigenous member of Parliament in Australia. |
1 |
6 |
House of Words Library |
|
1 |
5 |
Toni Risson Library |
Local author |
1 |
3 |
Glennis Nugent Library |
Local and founder of Qld’s first Book Fest |
1 |
2 |
4. Children’s library
Suggested name |
Why / Rationale |
Contributions |
Thumbs up |
Aunty Sharron/Sharron Lindh Library |
Local artist, craftsperson and musician |
3 |
424 |
Dreamtime Children’s Library |
Indigenous cultural reference |
1 |
62 |
Ash Barty Library |
Local tennis champion |
1 |
41 |
Ipswich City/Central Children’s Library |
Simplicity and easy wayfinding |
7 |
30 |
Shannon Library |
Local, long-time children’s nurse at Ipswich Hospital |
2 |
6 |
Bookworms Library |
|
1 |
14 |
Garden of Eden |
|
1 |
13 |
Wonderland |
|
1 |
8 |
World of Wonder |
|
1 |
7 |
Ipswich Nyamil Library |
“young ones” in traditional language |
1 |
5 |
Little Lizards Library |
|
1 |
1 |
Boomerang Library |
|
1 |
1 |
The Little Horses Library |
|
1 |
1 |
5. Administration building
Suggested name |
Why / Rationale |
Contributions |
Thumbs up |
Neville Bonner Building |
Local Indigenous politician. First Indigenous member of Parliament in Australia. |
2 |
88 |
Ipswich/council administration building/hub |
Simplicity and easy wayfinding |
12 |
62 |
Cribb and Foote |
Notable local business owners and store |
2 |
14 |
The Coal Face |
Nod to Ipswich’s mining history |
1 |
5 |
Square One |
Council getting back to basics and starting over in a new era of transparency and accountability |
1 |
4 |
Lewis Thomas House |
Local coal miner and developer |
1 |
2 |
John Murphy Building |
Ipswich’s first mayor |
1 |
2 |
Bremer Building |
Nod to Bremer River |
1 |
2 |
Joseph Fleming Building |
One of Ipswich’s first politicians elected in 1860 |
1 |
2 |
Thorn Place |
Notable local family |
1 |
2 |
Harold Blair Building |
Noted local Indigenous singer and OAM |
1 |
2 |
Bill Hayden Centre |
21st Governor General of Australia |
1 |
1 |
6. Event and function space located on level one of the administration building
Suggested name |
Why / Rationale |
Contributions |
Thumbs up |
Ash Barty Function Centre |
Local tennis champion |
1 |
467 |
Helen Clarke/Aunty Helen Event Room/Centre |
Affectionately known to everyone as Aunty Helen - has been teaching dance in Ipswich for over 70 years |
2 |
147 |
Harold Blair Function Centre |
Noted local Indigenous singer and OAM |
4 |
86 |
Dandiiri Space |
“meet” in traditional language |
2 |
30 |
Ipswich Event Centre |
|
1 |
7 |
Bremer Function Centre |
Named for the city’s river |
1 |
6 |
Limestone Space |
|
1 |
3 |
Piper Joe |
Local identity and noted Scottish piper |
1 |
2 |
Jeff McLean Room |
Local business owner and former Wallaby |
1 |
1 |
7. Event balcony space located on level one of the administration building
Suggested name |
Why / Rationale |
Contributions |
Thumbs up |
John Birmingham Balcony |
Local author |
1 |
112 |
The Balcony/Bremer Balcony |
Named for the city’s river |
6 |
23 |
Kunnar Balcony |
Means “one” in traditional language |
1 |
12 |
Limestone Balcony |
|
1 |
6 |
Bremer Events Space/Hub |
|
2 |
3 |
Stephen Potts Balcony |
Critical witness in Council’s CCC investigation |
1 |
3 |
Matthew Hickey Balcony |
Member, director and producer of the Ten Tenors |
1 |
2 |
Margaret Cook balcony |
Local historian |
1 |
1 |
Government View |
The open space reflects Council’s openness |
1 |
1 |
Clouds Balcony |
|
1 |
0 |
Jim Hawkins Balcony |
WWII digger and local identity |
1 |
0 |
Blodwyn Whitehead Balcony |
founder of Cambrian Junior and Youth choirs and musical identity of Ipswich |
1 |
0 |
Jeff McLean Balcony |
Local business owner and former Wallaby |
1 |
0 |
Capern Balcony |
Notable local musical family |
1 |
0 |
8. Laneway 1 – currently known as ICON Alley
Suggested name |
Why / Rationale |
Contributions |
Thumbs up |
Ross Lawrie Laneway |
Local known for giving back to the community |
1 |
571 |
Piper Joe Lane |
Local identity and noted Scottish piper |
1 |
502 |
Ash Barty Lane |
Local tennis champion |
1 |
168 |
Greenham’s Lane |
First owners of the commercial buildings on the corner of Nicholas and Brisbane Streets |
14 |
39 |
Storey Lane/Alley |
Named for local long-time union organiser and identity |
1 |
31 |
Supply Lane |
Original name for the alleyway when used by merchants |
6 |
9 |
Sister Shannon Lane |
Local, long-time children’s nurse at Ipswich Hospital |
1 |
6 |
Artist Lane |
Nod to the new mural on the wall |
1 |
5 |
Jeff Wegener Lane |
Locally-born musician who performed with the Saints and other bands since the 1970s |
1 |
3 |
Reeds Row |
|
1 |
3 |
Bonner Lane |
Neville Bonner family |
1 |
2 |
Jeff McLean Lane |
Local business owner and former Wallaby |
1 |
0 |
9. Laneway 2 – currently known as Bottle Alley
Suggested name |
Why / Rationale |
Contributions |
Thumbs up |
Bottle Alley |
Has been referred to as Bottle Alley for over 200 years. Originally the delivery route to the pub located in Nicholas Street |
43 |
819 |
Indigenous or heritage names |
|
1 |
18 |
Bottle Alley EATS |
Combined old name with new EATS precinct |
1 |
5 |
Frederick Aylott MM Lane |
|
1 |
3 |
Piper Joe Lane |
|
1 |
2 |
Ardent Avenue |
|
1 |
1 |
EATS Laneway/Lane |
|
2 |
0 |
Jeff McLean Lane |
|
1 |
0 |
Council currently has a procedure in relation to the naming of all roads, private roads, parks, bridges and places (Attachment 2).
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Local Government Act 2009
There is reputational risk associated with the naming of these places and spaces following community engagement in that there have been many diverse ideas presented by the community and Council will ultimately make the decision.
There are minor financial implications associated with the naming of the places and spaces that will be covered under the existing project contingency budget.
This community engagement program was designed to encourage the broader community to come on the redevelopment ‘journey’ with Council and create a sense of pride and ownership.
As noted, 2,938 people visited the Shape Your Ipswich page, with 304 contributions (and two email submissions). There were 6,405 “thumbs-ups” given to contributions (ie people supporting ideas already put forward). Of these interactions, 91 people are now following the page to keep up-to-date with the project. This is a very positive result, one of the strongest received on this site since its launch in 2019, and shows a desire by the community to have a say in Council’s decision-making process.
A full report on the community engagement, including demographics, is attached.
The Engagement Section thanks the community for its incredible support of this community engagement initiative and looks forward to closing the loop with participants following Council’s decision.
1. |
Community Engagement Report Places and Spaces Sept 2020 ⇩ |
2. |
Naming Procedure ⇩ |
Allison Grant
Engagement Manager
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Sean Madigan
Acting General Manager - Infrastructure and Environment
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
ITEM: 15.6
SUBJECT: Quarter 2 - Operational Plan 2020-2021 Quarterly Performance Report
AUTHOR: Corporate Planning Officer
DATE: 28 January 2021
This is a report concerning an assessment of Ipswich City Council’s progress towards implementation of the 2020-2021 Operational Plan with notable achievements that have occurred during quarter two (Q2). Departmental representatives have provided the presented Q2 data.
That the report be received and the contents noted.
There are no related party matters associated with this report.
Strengthening our local economy and building prosperity
Managing growth and delivering key infrastructure
Caring for the community
Caring for the environment
Listening, leading and financial management
The 2020-2021 Operational Plan was formally adopted by Council on 30 June 2020. Section 174 of the Local Government Regulation 2012 states the Chief Executive Officer must present to the local government a written assessment of progress towards implementation of the Operational Plan at a minimum of quarterly intervals.
An assessment of council’s progress during Q2, being 1 October 2020 to 31 December 2020, has been prepared from commentary provided by the responsible officers and is contained in Attachment 1. Council’s Finance Branch provides to council a separate report with high-level details on the financial performance. A full report of performance against the
2020-2021 Operational Plan will be included in council’s Annual Report and will be presented at the conclusion of the financial year.
The table below provides a snapshot of the current positioning of each deliverable against the stated target. To clarify the progress statements used in the table, please refer to the below legend:
Not yet commenced |
This deliverable has not yet begun, but is scheduled to begin later in the year and be completed within the FY. |
At Risk |
This deliverable has started, but is at risk of not being completed by the EOFY or not achieving its targeted outcome. |
On Track |
This deliverable has started and is progressing as planned. |
Not Proceeding |
This deliverable is not progressing as scheduled and funding has been reallocated. |
Complete |
This deliverable has been completed and has achieved the targeted outcome. |
Status |
Number |
% |
Not yet Commenced |
0 |
0% |
At Risk |
6 |
8% |
On Target |
53 |
72% |
Not Proceeding |
3 |
4% |
Complete |
12 |
16% |
Total |
74 |
100 |
|
|
|
A detailed list of those items At Risk and Not Proceeding are included as Attachment 2.
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Local Government Regulation 2012
Section 174 of the Local Government Regulation 2012 states the Chief Executive Officer must present to the local government a written assessment of progress towards implementation of the Operational Plan at a minimum of quarterly intervals.
The highest risk is political/reputational should council fail to meet the mandated deadline for adoption of the Operational Plan Quarterly Report.
Extenuating circumstances outside council’s control continue to impact council’s ability to progress a number of the deliverables identified in the Operational Plan 2020-2021.
The content of this report has been developed from commentary provided by each department. This information provides an update on council’s progress towards achieving the objectives of council’s Operational Plan 2020-2021 and presents notable achievements during quarter two.
This is a report concerning an assessment of Ipswich City Council’s progress towards implementation of the Operational Plan 2020-2021 and notable achievements that have occurred during the quarter. Q2 data as provided by departmental representatives is presented. A full assessment of the Operational Plan 2020-2021 will be included in Council’s Annual Report that will be presented later in the year.
1. |
Q2 Operational Plan ⇩ |
2. |
Q2 2020-2021 At Risk Not Proceeding Deliverables ⇩ |
Louise Randall
Corporate Planning Officer
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Joshua Edwards
Acting Manager, Performance
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Barbara Dart
Acting General Manager, Coordination and Performance
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
ITEM: 15.7
SUBJECT: Tender No. 15218 - Trevor Street, Bellbird Park - Road Rehabilitation
AUTHOR: Category Specialist (Building Construction and Maintenance)
DATE: 15 February 2021
Executive Summary
This is a report concerning the recommendation to award Tender 15218 Trevor Street, Bellbird Park and seek Council’s approval to award Contract 15218 to BMD Constructions Pty Ltd for the completion of road rehabilitation and stabilisation works at Trevor Street, Bellbird Park.
Council’s Infrastructure and Environment Department (IED) identified civil and road construction works located at Trevor Street, Bellbird Park were required as a priority capital works project due to ground settlement in the vicinity of a boulder wall, failures that have occurred in the road and storm water drains. An open tender was facilitated to engage a suitably qualified and experienced contractor to complete these civil and road construction works at Trevor Street, Bellbird Park.
The works are considered to be complex requiring a contractor with particular expertise and experience. The open tender process provided the opportunity for a number of local businesses to submit a response. The offer put forward by BMD Constructions Pty Ltd, which is not a local business, was considered and recommended by the evaluation panel to represent the best overall value for money for Council for this capital works project.
This report recommends that Council enter into a contract with BMD Constructions Pty Ltd for the sum of two million two hundred and forty-one thousand five hundred and forty dollars and seventy-five cents ($2,241,540.75) excluding GST.
A. That Tender No. 15218 for Trevor Street, Bellbird Park – Road Rehabilitation be awarded to BMD Constructions Pty Ltd (ABN 59 010 126 100).
B. That Council enter into a contract with BMD Constructions Pty Ltd for Trevor Street, Bellbird Park – Road Rehabilitation, for the sum of two million two hundred and forty-one thousand five hundred and forty dollars and seventy-five cents ($2,241,540.75) excluding GST.
C. That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to negotiate and finalise the terms of the contract to be executed by Council and to do any other acts necessary to implement Council’s decision in accordance with section 13(3) of the Local Government Act 2009.
RELATED PARTIES
The Evaluation Panel declared no Conflicts of Interest.
Advance Ipswich Theme
Managing growth and delivering key infrastructure
Purpose of Report/Background
Council’s Infrastructure and Environment Department (IED) identified civil and road construction works located at Trevor Street, Bellbird Park were required as a priority capital works project due to ground settlement in the vicinity of a boulder wall, failures that have occurred in the road and storm water drains. An open tender was facilitated to engage a suitably qualified and experienced contractor to complete these civil and road construction works at Trevor Street, Bellbird Park.
Legal/Policy Basis
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Local Government Act 2009
Local Government Regulation 2012
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
No risks (legal or insurance) were identified with the recommended supplier. Details of commercial risks and mitigations are available in Attachment 3.
Financial/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
Construction Budget including Contingency (10%) |
$3,146,670.00 |
Contract Award (BMD Constructions Pty Ltd) |
$2,241,540.75 |
Under Budget |
$905,129.25 |
COMMUNITY and OTHER CONSULTATION
IED as the contract user, were consulted and have endorsed the recommendation to award.
Conclusion
This report seeks the Council’s approval to award Tender 15218 Trevor Street, Bellbird Park to BMD Constructions Pty Ltd. Their offer as determined by the Evaluation Panel offers Council the best value for money.
Attachments and Confidential Background Papers
1. |
Proposed Work ⇩ |
2. |
Location of Works ⇩ |
|
|
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
3. |
|
4. |
Gavin Wright
Category Specialist (Building Construction and Maintenance)
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Richard White
Manager, Procurement
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Sonia Cooper
General Manager Corporate Services
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Graeme Martin
Manager, Works and Field Services
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Sean Madigan
Acting General Manager - Infrastructure and Environment
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
David Farmer
Chief Executive Officer
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
ITEM: 15.8
SUBJECT: Tender No. 16063 - Civil and Bridge Construction Works - Springfield Parkway and Springfield Greenbank Arterial, Springfield
AUTHOR: Category Specialist (Building Construction and Maintenance)
DATE: 16 February 2021
Executive Summary
This is a report concerning the recommendation to award Tender 16063 Civil and Bridge Construction Works – Springfield Parkway and Springfield Greenbank Arterial, Springfield and seek Council’s approval to award Contract 16063 to BMD Constructions Pty Ltd for the completion of bulk earthworks and construction of a single span bridge crossing Opossum Creek.
BMD Constructions Pty Ltd is recommended as the successful tenderer as they are considered to present the best value for money for this significant capital works project. BMD provided a very competitive price, and a clear methodology with extensive details and staging plans for all components. BMD Constructions Pty Ltd is not a local business however nearly 25% of the contract value will be spent within the local region.
The report recommends that Council resolve to enter into a contract with BMD Constructions Pty Ltd for Civil and Bridge Construction Works – Springfield Parkway and Springfield Greenbank Arterial, for the sum of three million eight hundred and nine thousand four hundred and eighty-one dollars and fifty-eight cents ($3,809,481.58) excluding GST.
A. That Tender No. 16063 Civil and Bridge Construction Works – Springfield Parkway and Springfield Greenbank Arterial be awarded to BMD Constructions Pty Ltd (ABN 59 010 126 100).
B. That Council enter into a contract with BMD Constructions Pty Ltd for Civil and Bridge Construction Works – Springfield Parkway and Springfield Greenbank Arterial, for the sum of three million eight hundred and nine thousand four hundred and eighty-one dollars and fifty-eight cents ($3,809,481.58) excluding GST.
C. That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to negotiate and finalise the terms of the contract to be executed by Council and to do any other acts necessary to implement Council’s decision in accordance with section 13(3) of the Local Government Act 2009.
RELATED PARTIES
The Evaluation Panel declared no conflicts of interest.
Advance Ipswich Theme
Managing growth and delivering key infrastructure
Purpose of Report/Background
The City of Ipswich identifies the need to upgrade or duplicate Springfield Parkway and Springfield Greenbank Arterial to four lanes to meet the population and employment growth in the area, and the associated travel demands.
The scope for Stage 1 Package 1 includes bulk earthworks in preparation for services relocations, retaining wall installation, stormwater and underground conduit installation.
It also includes site preparation and construction of a single span 20m bridge crossing Opossum Creek including all earth works, civil works and structural works in preparation for Stage 1 Package 2.
As per the table below, the cost of Stage 1 Package 1 is $3,809,481.58. This amount is consistent with the overall budget estimates for this project.
BMD Constructions Pty Ltd is recommended as the successful tenderer as they are considered to present the best value for money for this significant capital works project. BMD provided a very competitive price, and a clear methodology with extensive details and staging plans for all components. BMD Constructions Pty Ltd is not a local business however nearly 25% of the contract value will be spent within the local region.
Legal/Policy Basis
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Local Government Act 2009
Local Government Regulation 2012
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
No risks (legal or insurance) were identified with the recommended supplier. Details of commercial risks and mitigations are available in Attachment 3.
Financial/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
Overall Construction Budget including Contingency (10%) (includes budget for Package 2 of this project) |
$20,319,764.00 |
Contract Award (BMD Constructions Pty Ltd) |
$3,809,481.58 |
Under Budget / Estimate |
$16,510,282.42 |
COMMUNITY and OTHER CONSULTATION
The Infrastructure and Environment (IED) as the contract user, were consulted and have endorsed the recommendation to award.
Conclusion
This report seeks the Council’s approval to award Tender 16063 Civil and Bridge Construction Works – Springfield Parkway and Springfield Greenbank Arterial, Springfield to BMD Constructions Pty Ltd. Their offer as determined by the Evaluation Panel offers Council the best value for money.
Attachments and Confidential Background Papers
1. |
Fact Sheet ⇩ |
2. |
Location of Project ⇩ |
|
|
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
3. |
|
4. |
Gavin Wright
Category Specialist (Building Construction and Maintenance)
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Richard White
Manager, Procurement
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Sonia Cooper
General Manager Corporate Services
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Graeme Martin
Manager, Works and Field Services
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Sean Madigan
Acting General Manager - Infrastructure and Environment
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
David Farmer
Chief Executive Officer
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
ITEM: 15.9
SUBJECT: Monthly Financial Performance Report - January 2021
AUTHOR: Chief Financial Officer
DATE: 9 February 2021
This is a report concerning Council’s financial performance for the period ending 31 January 2021, submitted in accordance with section 204 of the Local Government Regulation 2012.
That the report on Council’s financial performance for the period ending 31 January 2021, submitted in accordance with section 204 of the Local Government Regulation 2012 be considered and noted by Council.
There are no conflicts of interest or related party matters associated with this report.
Strengthening our local economy and building prosperity
The attached report outlines the financial results for Ipswich City Council as at 31 January 2021. The total Net Result (including capital revenue for Ipswich City Council as at 31 January 2021 is $52.8 million compared to the year to date (YTD) budget of $54.3 million.
Council’s operating surplus (excluding capital revenue) is approximately $3.3 million compared to the YTD Budget deficit of $7.3 million. This continues to be driven by additional fees and charges revenue as well as under expenditure in the first half of the financial year.
Overall, capital expenditure including the Nicholas Street Redevelopment as at 31 January 2021 is $31.2 million below the YTD original phased budget that was prepared in June 2020. Asset donations as at 31 January 2021 are $6.2 million under the YTD budget.
A detailed review is being completed by the Finance Branch which will forecast the net and operating positions for 2020-2021 and will inform an upcoming budget amendment being prepared.
Revenue
As mentioned in previous months, rates and utilities charges are under budget relating to the valuation and rate categorisation changes. This result may be offset, to some extent, by better than forecast residential growth, but this will need to be monitored throughout the second half of the financial year.
Fees and charges revenue was approximately on budget for the month of January 2021, with fees and charges remaining $4.6 million favourable to budget YTD. Approximately $3.8 million of the YTD variance relates to Town Planning and Development Fees. In conjunction with Planning and Regulatory Services Department (PRS), Finance Branch will amend the forecast revenue as part of the budget review and subsequent budget amendment.
Government grant revenue is approximately $2.9 million under the YTD budget primarily relating to the Infrastructure and Environment Department (IED) where grants budgeted for in January have not yet been received.
Other revenue continues to track above budget relating to the Queensland Urban Utilities (QUU) tax revenue payments which is subject to QUU’s revenue and tax position throughout the year. Also over budget in IED is the revenue that relates to the Road Maintenance Performance Contract (RMPC) received earlier than expected and unbudgeted revenue received from Energex for tree replacements.
Donated asset revenue is approximately $6.2 million under budget YTD relating to lower than expected donated revenue in IED for the months of December and January.
Expenses
Employee expenses including labour contracts are over budget $271k or 0.4% YTD as at January 2021. A significant amount of the YTD variance relates to contractual termination payments paid during the period which were not budgeted for.
Analysis on leave entitlements in January has confirmed a slightly more positive impact on employee expenses due to a higher amount of leave taken throughout the holiday period as forecast. Finance will continue to monitor leave entitlements expenditure through weekly labour snapshot reports.
Materials and services (excluding
labour contracts) are under budget $6.2 million YTD.
$4.2 million relates to IED as a result of delays in projects, lower than
expected maintenance costs, delay in the payment of the SES Service Agreement
and minor variances across the Department. $1.7 million relates to under-expenditure
in Community, Cultural & Economic Development Department (CCED) primarily
in the Libraries and Customer Service Branch and Marketing and Promotion Branch.
This is partially offset by PRS over budget ($229k) primarily relating to major
legal appeals.
As mentioned last month, as part of the detailed budget amendment, Finance Branch will liaise with managers in relation to under-expenditure to date and forecast expenditure that will be incurred this financial year.
Other expenses are over budget YTD January resulting from the loss on disposal of assets of $4.4 million following the rehabilitation and replacement of assets. This is partially offset by under budget in CCED relating to a change in accounting treatment for the recognition of leases now being recorded under depreciation and Resource Recovery relating to waste levy charges.
Depreciation is under budget by $133k in the month and approximately $2.7 million YTD above budget. The favourable result during the month resulted from a reversal of depreciation applied in July 2020 as a result of an adjustment in fair value. As mentioned in previous months, changes in accounting treatment and sale of some assets have resulted in variances in the depreciation result this financial year. Additional depreciation will be incurred next year when the new Council Administration Building and civic space become operational.
Capital Expenditure
The total YTD capital expenditure (including the Nicholas Street redevelopment) when compared to the original phased budget is $98.1 million compared to a budget of $129.3 million. With the significant changes in the timing of the delivery of the capital program, the budget amendment will re-phase the forecast expenditure.
The variances in the Nicholas Street capital expenditure relates to the changes in the delivery of the retail building upgrades. The Nicholas Street project team are currently reviewing the final costs of the project and the timing as a result of the changes in relation to the retail buildings and strategy.
The IED expenditure in the month was $3.8 million and in line with the Department’s recent $3.6 million forecast. Total YTD expenditure is $23.5m.
Following a detailed review of forecast project costs for the financial year, the revised forecast IED capital expenditure in total for the 2020-21 year is estimated at $72.1 million against a current adopted budget of $86.6 million.
The reduced forecast expenditure includes savings and under-expenditure on projects and programs being delivered (e.g. sealed road program) and projects deferred to the 2021-2022 year. This will all be included in the budget amendment being prepared.
Cash Balances
Council’s cash held in the bank and investments is slightly above forecasts due to the delays in the capital program.
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Local Government Regulation 2012
As mentioned above, Finance is completing a detailed review of revenue and expenditure and an estimated forecast is being prepared for the financial year which can be incorporated into a budget amendment. This is ongoing. The original budget was prepared based on best estimates in relation to possible COVID-19 impacts and while this risk still exists for the remainder of the year, year to date variances can be updated.
Further analysis and discussion will need to occur in relation to FTE, vacancies and forecast employee expenses for the year.
Detailed analysis of the current material and services is underway to again confirm what expenditure will be incurred and what can be adjusted in a budget amendment and offset against new commitments.
The reduced forecast capital expenditure in the year will also be assessed and projects deferred will need to be included in the 2021-22 budget and the 3 year capital program updated accordingly. Significant forecast expenditure is still to be incurred and projects delivered in the remainder of the financial year.
There are no specific implications as a result of this report.
The contents of this report did not require any community consultation. Analysis and explanations of the variances are undertaken in conjunction with the various departments.
The monthly performance report for January 2021 is included at Attachment 1.
1. |
Monthly Performance Report - January 2021 ⇩ |
Jeffrey Keech
Chief Financial Officer
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Sonia Cooper
General Manager Corporate Services
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Council Meeting Agenda |
25 February 2021 |
ITEM: 16.1
FROM: Councillor Russell Milligan
RE: Notice of Motion - Property Valuations
DATE: 15 February 2021
This is a notice of motion submitted by Councillor Russell Milligan concerning property valuations.
Councillor Russell Milligan gave notice of his intention to move the following motion at the Council Meeting of 25 February 2021:
MOTION:
A. That the Chief Executive Officer be requested to write to the Valuer-General requesting that revised valuations be undertaken for the Ipswich City Council local government area on an annual basis, giving particular consideration to the valuation increases experienced in the significant growth areas across the City.
B. That a delegation consisting of the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and another Councillor be arranged with the Valuer-General to discuss the need to undertake annual valuations given the rapid development and projected population increase for Ipswich.
BACKGROUND
All local governments in Queensland, including Ipswich City Council, are required to pay a significant fee to the Queensland Government for the supply of the valuation roll by the Valuer-General regardless of whether or not it receives city-wide revised land valuations in a particular year. Ipswich City Councils most recent annual fee paid to the Valuer-General in July last year was $637,000.
Since 2011, Ipswich City Council has only been provided with city-wide revised land valuations every second year. The last city-wide revised land valuations were undertaken for the 2019-2020 year. Council has been advised by the Valuer-General’s office that city-wide revised land valuations will not be undertaken for the Ipswich City Council local government area for the 2021-2022 year. By June 2022 these land valuations will be three years old.
The Ipswich City Council area has a diverse community across a large geographical area that encompasses a wide variety of land uses. In recent years the high growth areas of Ipswich such as Springfield Lakes, Augustine Heights, Ripley and South Ripley have experienced significant increases in their land valuations compared to average increases across the whole city. Ipswich City Council utilises the provisions of valuation averaging and rate capping available to it under the Local Government Act 2009 to minimise the impact that these large valuations movement have on individual ratepayers. The provision of city-wide revised land valuations, on an annual basis, by the Queensland Government would be a further step that would assist in moderating the impact of large land valuation increases for the ratepayers of the Ipswich community.